临床研究

胸腰筋膜平面阻滞对椎间盘源性腰痛患者围术期镇痛的效果

  • 韩刘虎 ,
  • 胡军 ,
  • 张荣宜 ,
  • 王立奎
展开
  • 安徽医科大学第一附属医院疼痛科 (合肥 230000 )

收稿日期: 2023-11-24

  网络出版日期: 2024-05-21

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(81901086);安徽省自然科学基金项目(1808085MH310)

Assessing the efficacy of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for perioperative analgesia in patients with discogenic low back pain

  • Liuhu HAN ,
  • Jun HU ,
  • Rongyi ZHANG ,
  • Likui. WANG
Expand
  • Department of Pain,the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230000,China

Received date: 2023-11-24

  Online published: 2024-05-21

摘要

目的 探讨超声引导下双侧胸腰筋膜平面阻滞(TLIPB)对行经皮椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术(PTED)的椎间盘源性腰痛(DLBP)患者的围术期镇痛效果。 方法 选取57例椎间盘源性腰痛患者,使用计算机生成的随机编号将患者分为A组(对照组)28例患者,B组(超声引导下双侧胸腰筋膜平面阻滞组)29例患者。比较两组患者术前(t0)、术后2 h(t1)、术后6 h(t2)、术后12 h(t3)及术后24 h(t4)静息和翻身时视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)的差异。比较两组患者术前及术后24 h 15项恢复质量评分(QoR-15)的差异。比较两组患者入室后(T0)、切皮时(T1)、椎间孔成形时(T2)、外科医生认定疼痛最剧烈时(T3)、手术结束时(T4)的平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)变化的差异。记录术中及术后24 h内不良事件。 结果 所有患者均顺利完成手术和超声引导下双侧TLIPB,无椎间隙感染,无脊髓、神经根和血管损伤,无恶心呕吐等严重并发症。两组患者组内术后各时间点静息及翻身时VAS评分及术后24 h QoR-15评分均较术前显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者术前及术后各时间点静息时VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组患者术后2 h、术后6 h及术后12 h翻身时VAS评分差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),其余时间点差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组患者术前及术后24 h QoR-15 评分相比差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),且两组患者术后24 h QoR-15 评分相比差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者椎间孔成形时(T2)和外科医生认定疼痛最剧烈时(T3)时MAP及HR差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 结论 超声引导下双侧胸腰筋膜平面阻滞可以有效缓解PTED术后疼痛,减少围术期应激反应及不良事件的发生,加速患者术后康复。

本文引用格式

韩刘虎 , 胡军 , 张荣宜 , 王立奎 . 胸腰筋膜平面阻滞对椎间盘源性腰痛患者围术期镇痛的效果[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024 , 40(10) : 1370 -1375 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.10.007

Abstract

Objective To investigate the perioperative analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (TLIPB) in patients with discogenic low back pain (DLBP) undergoing percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED). Methods Fifty-seven patients with discogenic low back pain admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2022 to April 2022 were randomly divided into group A (control group)with 28 patients and group B (ultrasound-guided bilateral thoracolumbar interfascialinterfacial plane block group) with 29 patients. The differences of visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and turning over were compared between the two groups preoperative (t0), 2 hours postoperative (t1), 6 hours postoperative (t2), 12 hours postoperative (t3) and 24 hours postoperative (t4). The differences of quality of recovery-15 scores (QoR-15) were compared between the two groups preoperative and 24 hours postoperative. The changes of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were compared between the two groups after entering the operating room (T0), at the time of skin incision (T1), at the time of foraminoplasty (T2), at the time of the most severe pain recognized by the surgeon (T3), and at the end of the operation (T4).Adverse events were recorded during the operation and within 24 hours postoperative. Results All patients successfully completed the operation and ultrasound-guided bilateral TLIPB, without intervertebral space infection, spinal cord, nerve root and vascular injury, and serious complications such as nausea and vomiting. VAS scores at rest and turning over and QoR-15 scores at 24 hours postoperative were significantly lower than preoperative in the two groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups at rest at preoperative and postoperative time points (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in VAS scores at 2 hours, 6 hours and 12 hours postoperative between the two groups (P < 0.05). There were significant difference in QoR-15 scores between the two groups at preoperative and 24 hours postoperative (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference in QoR-15 scores between the two groups at 24 hours postoperative (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in MAP and HR between the two groups at the time of foraminoplasty (T2) and at the time of the most severe pain recognized by the surgeon (T3)(P< 0.05). Conclusions Ultrasound-guided bilateral thoracolumbar interfascial plane block can effectively relieve the pain after PTED, reduce the occurrence of perioperative stress response and adverse events, accelerate the postoperative rehabilitation of patients, and shorten the postoperative duration of hospitalization.

参考文献

1 MOHD ISA I L, TEOH S L, MOHD NOR N H, et al. Discogenic Low Back Pain: Anatomy, Pathophysiology and Treatments of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 24(1):208. doi:10.3390/ijms24010208
2 AAVIKKO A, LOHMAN M, RISTOLAINEN L, et al. ISSLS prize in clinical science 2022: accelerated disc degeneration after pubertal growth spurt differentiates adults with low back pain from their asymptomatic peers[J]. Eur Spine J, 2022, 31(5): 1080-1087. doi:10.1007/s00586-022-07184-0
3 刘丰平,赵红卫,陈海丹. 微创手术治疗椎间盘源性腰痛临床应用进展[J]. 实用医学杂志,2014,30(8):1179-1181. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2014.08.001
4 YANG L, LI W, YANG Y, et al. The correlation between the lumbar disc MRI high-intensity zone and discogenic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2023, 18(1): 758. doi:10.1186/s13018-023-04187-5
5 MASUDA K, SHIGEMATSU H, MAEDA M, et al. Ultrasound-guided disc pain induction test for diagnosis of discogenic lumbar pain: a cross-sectional study[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2023, 18(1): 847. doi:10.1186/s13018-023-04327-x
6 CAO Z L, XU H, WU J Q, et al. The Clinical Efficacy of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Interventional Circulatory Perfusion Combined with Radiofrequency Ablation and Thermocoagulation in the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2023, 2023: 1489905. doi:10.1155/2023/1489905
7 CHENG J, ZHENG W, WANG H, et al. Posterolateral transforaminal selective endoscopic diskectomy with thermal annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain: a prospective observational study[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2014, 39(26 Spec No.): B60-5. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000000495
8 MANCHIKANTI L, HIRSCH J A. An update on the management of chronic lumbar discogenic pain[J]. Pain Manag, 2015, 5(5): 373-386. doi:10.2217/pmt.15.33
9 KAPETANAKIS S, FLOROS E, GKANTSINIKOUDIS N. Extreme cases in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery: case series and brief review of the literature[J]. Br J Neurosurg, 2021: 1-5.
10 李军杰,唐兰兰,杨镇源,等. 天玑机器人改良导航系统在脊柱内镜髓核摘除术中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志,2023,39(12):1564-1570. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.12.018
11 闫庆阳,石翊飒. 胸腰筋膜平面阻滞在脊柱外科手术围术期的应用进展[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志,2023,39(5):546-549. doi:10.12089/jca.2023.05.020
12 PENG Q, MENG B, YANG S, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Clin J Pain, 2024,40(2):114-123. doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000001177
13 HU Z, HAN J, JIAO B, et al. Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials[J]. Pain Physician, 2021, 24(7): E1085-E1097.
14 彭兵,杜立龙,张同星,等. 椎间盘源性腰痛的发病机制与治疗进展[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2023,31(16):1488-1492.
15 LYU F J, CUI H, PAN H, et al. Painful intervertebral disc degeneration and inflammation: from laboratory evidence to clinical interventions[J]. Bone Res, 2021, 9(1): 7. doi:10.1038/s41413-020-00125-x
16 WANG L, HE T, LIU J, et al. Revealing the Immune Infiltration Landscape and Identifying Diagnostic Biomarkers for Lumbar Disc Herniation[J]. Front Immunol, 2021, 12: 666355. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.666355
17 ZHANG S, HU B, LIU W, et al. The role of structure and function changes of sensory nervous system in intervertebral disc-related low back pain[J]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2021, 29(1): 17-27. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2020.09.002
18 LIU K C, YANG S K, OU B R, et al. Using Percutaneous Endoscopic Outside-In Technique to Treat Selected Patients with Refractory Discogenic Low Back Pain[J]. Pain Physician, 2019, 22(2): 187-198.
19 BILGE A, BA?ARAN B. Postoperative quality of recovery with erector spinae plane block or thoracolumbar interfascial plane block after major spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Eur Spine J, 2023,130(1):e137-e147. doi:10.1007/s00586-023-07998-6
20 HAND W R, TAYLOR J M, HARVEY N R, et al. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block: a pilot study in volunteers[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2015, 62(11): 1196-1200. doi:10.1007/s12630-015-0431-y
21 LONG G, LIU C, LIANG T, et al. The efficacy of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for lumbar spinal surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2023, 18(1): 318. doi:10.1186/s13018-023-03798-2
22 PAVITHRAN P, SUDARSHAN P K, ELIYAS S, et al. Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries-A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2022, 66(6): 436-441. doi:10.4103/ija.ija_1054_21
23 张荣宜,朱本藩,赵家贵,等. 椎间孔镜手术中漂移法与骨钻椎间孔成形法放置工作套管的比较[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志,2022,28(2):113-118. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2022.02.006
24 TAKAHASHI Y, CHIBA T, KUROKAWA M, et al. Stereoscopic structure of sensory nerve fibers in the lumbar spine and related tissues[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003, 28(9): 871-880. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000058717.43888.b9
25 BrEEMER M C, MALESSy M J A, Notenboom R G E. Origin, branching pattern, foraminal and intraspinal distribution of the human lumbar sinuvertebral nerves[J]. Spine J, 2022, 22(3): 472-482. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.021
26 FORERO M, ADHIKARY S D, LOPEZ H, et al. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2016, 41(5): 621-627. doi:10.1097/aap.0000000000000451
文章导航

/