收稿日期: 2023-09-26
网络出版日期: 2024-04-19
基金资助
广东省自然科学基金项目(2020A1515010159);深圳市第三人民医院2022年度院内临床类项目(G2022043)
The application of opioid free with spontaneous breathing anesthesia in day surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis
Received date: 2023-09-26
Online published: 2024-04-19
目的 探讨无阿片保留自主呼吸麻醉策略在胸腔镜下胸交感神经切断治疗手汗症中的临床效果。 方法 手汗症患者择期行喉罩全麻下手术治疗93例,随机分为对照组(C组)和观察组(O组)。C组采用丙泊酚+舒芬太尼+顺式阿曲库铵麻醉,O组采用丙泊酚+右美托咪定+胸椎旁阻滞麻醉。观察两组患者麻醉前(T1)、切皮即刻(T2)、术毕(T3)、出手术室(T4)生命体征及血气指标变化,记录患者苏醒即刻(P1)、出手术室(P2)、术后2 h(P3)、术后6 h(P4)、术后24 h(P5)的视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS),并记录患者围术期麻醉相关并发症发生情况、术后恢复时间和患者对麻醉的满意度。 结果 围术期未发生手术中断或更改麻醉方式病例。两组各时点镇静及疼痛指数的变化差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),O组P1、P4时点VAS评分较高,T2时点PH较低,PCO2、BG较高(P < 0.05),围术期高血压、心动过速的发生率较高(P < 0.05)。两组术后恢复时间及患者满意度的比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 在手汗症日间手术中联合无阿片及保留自主呼吸麻醉策略安全可行,但该技术在临床应用无明显优势。
刘民强 , 洪凤珠 , 郭珊珊 , 何俊永 , 杨晓瑞 , 施琴朗 , 何仁亮 , 吴强 . 无阿片保留自主呼吸麻醉在手汗症日间手术中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024 , 40(8) : 1069 -1073 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.08.008
Objective This study aime to investigate the clinical status of opioid free with spontaneous breathing anesthesia in the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis through thoracic sympathectomy under thoracoscopy. Methods A total of 93 patients with palmar hyperhidrosis who underwent elective surgery with general anesthesia were randomly divided into control group (group C) and observation group (group O). In group C, patients were treated with propofol, sufentanil, and cisatracurium. In group O, patients were anesthetized with propofol, dexmedetomidine, and thoracic paravertebral block. The changes of vital signs and blood gas indicators between two groups before anesthesia (T1), at the time of skin incision (T2), after surgery (T3), and leaving the operating room (T4) were observed. The visual analog scale (VAS) of patients immediately after awakening (P1), leaving the operating room (P2), 2 hours (P3), 6 hours (P4), and 24 hours after surgery (P5) were recorded. The occurrence of perioperative anesthesia related complications, postoperative recovery time and patients′ satisfaction were also observed. Results There was no case of surgical interruption due to anesthesia or anesthesia methods changing during the perioperative period. And no significant difference in the changes of sedation and pain index was observed between two groups (P > 0.05). However, in group O, the VAS scores were higher at P1 and P4 (P > 0.05), PH was lower, PCO2 and BG were higher at T2 (P < 0.05), and the incidence of perioperative hypertension and tachycardia was higher (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant difference in postoperative recovery time and patient′s satisfaction between these two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion The implementation of opioid free with spontaneous breathing anesthesia strategy in day surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis is safe and feasible but the application of this strategy has no significant advantages in clinical practice of day surgery.
| 1 | KUIJPERS M, VAN ZANDEN J E, HARMS P W, et al. Minimally Invasive Sympathicotomy for Palmar Hyperhidrosis and Facial Blushing: Current Status and the Hyperhidrosis Expert Center Approach [J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(3):786. doi:10.3390/jcm11030786 |
| 2 | HIRAKAWA N, HIGASHIMOTO I, TAKAMORI A, et al. The impact of endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy on sudomotor function in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis [J]. Clin Auton Res, 2021, 31(2):225-230. doi:10.1007/s10286-020-00685-2 |
| 3 | BELOEIL H. Opioid-free anesthesia [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2019, 33(3):353-360. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2019.09.002 |
| 4 | TEMPE D K, SAWHNEY C. Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Thoracic Surgery: A Step Forward [J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2020, (11):3041-3043. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.022 |
| 5 | PALACZYNSKI P, MISIOLEK H, SZARPAK L, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficiency and Safety of Double-Lumen Tube and Bronchial Blocker for One-Lung Ventilation [J]. J Clin Med, 2023, 12(5):1877. doi:10.3390/jcm12051877 |
| 6 | MOREAULT O, COUTURE E J, PROVENCHER S, et al. Double-lumen endotracheal tubes and bronchial blockers exhibit similar lung collapse physiology during lung isolation [J]. Can J Anaesth, 2021, 68(6):791-800. doi:10.1007/s12630-021-01938-y |
| 7 | 江宁彬, 许梅, 李泉,等. 非损伤性双肺缺氧预处理对单肺通气手术患者的肺保护作用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(19):2424-2428. |
| 8 | NAKANISHI T, SENTO Y, KAMIMURA Y, et al. Combined use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and a bronchial blocker vs. a double-lumen endobronchial tube in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial [J]. J Clin Anesth, 2023, 88:111136. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111136 |
| 9 | BELOEIL H, GAROT M, LEBUFFE G, et al. Balanced Opioid-free Anesthesia with Dexmedetomidine versus Balanced Anesthesia with Remifentanil for Major or Intermediate Noncardiac Surgery [J]. Anesthesiology, 2021, 134(4):541-551. doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000003725 |
| 10 | HUNG M H, CHEN J S, CHENG Y J. Precise anesthesia in thoracoscopic operations [J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2019, 32(1):39-43. doi:10.1097/aco.0000000000000680 |
| 11 | SHAO G Q, PANG D Z, ZHANG J T, et al. Spontaneous ventilation anesthesia combined with uniportal and tubeless thoracoscopic sympathectomy in selected patients with primary palmar hyperhidrosis [J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2022, 17(1):177. doi:10.1186/s13019-022-01917-4 |
| 12 | CHEN W, ZHANG C, WANG G, et al. The feasibility and safety of?thoracoscopic?surgery under epidural and/or local anesthesia for spontaneous pneumothorax: a meta-analysis [J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2017, 12(3):216-224. |
| 13 | KANG K, MENG X, LI B, et al. Effect of thoracic?paravertebral?nerve?block?on the early postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing?thoracoscopic?radical lung cancer surgery [J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2020, 18(1):298. doi:10.1186/s12957-020-02071-8 |
| 14 | PORELA-TIIHONEN S, KOKKI H, KOKKI M. An up-to-date overview of sublingual sufentanil for the treatment of moderate to severe pain [J]. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2020, 21(12):1407-1418. doi:10.1080/14656566.2020.1766025 |
| 15 | GINOSAR Y, HAROUTOUNIAN S, KAGAN L, et al. Proliposomal Ropivacaine Oil: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data After Subcutaneous Administration in Volunteers [J]. Anesth Analg, 2016, 122(5):1673-1680. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000001217 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |