药物与临床

瑞马唑仑复合地氟烷全身麻醉联合氟马西尼拮抗在眼科日间手术中的应用

  • 胡春华 ,
  • 王古岩 ,
  • 王惠军 ,
  • 奚春花 ,
  • 张丛雅 ,
  • 吴黎黎
展开
  • 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院麻醉科 (北京 100730 )

收稿日期: 2023-10-11

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-08

基金资助

北京市医院管理中心临床医学发展专项扬帆计划(ZYLX202103);北京市医院管理中心登峰计划(DFL20220203)

Effect of remimazolam combined with desflurane and flumazenil antagonism for anesthesia during ophthalmic day surgery

  • Chunhua HU ,
  • Guyan WANG ,
  • Huijun WANG ,
  • Chunhua XI ,
  • Congya ZHANG ,
  • Lili. WU
Expand
  • Department of Anesthesiology,Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University,Beijing 100730,China

Received date: 2023-10-11

  Online published: 2024-03-08

摘要

目的 探讨瑞马唑仑复合地氟烷全身麻醉联合氟马西尼拮抗用于眼科日间手术的麻醉效果。 方法 前瞻性随机对照试验,选择择期喉罩全身麻醉的眼科日间手术患者64例,随机分为丙泊酚组(n = 32)和瑞马唑仑组(n = 32)。丙泊酚组给予丙泊酚麻醉诱导,丙泊酚复合地氟烷麻醉维持;瑞马唑仑组给予瑞马唑仑麻醉诱导,瑞马唑仑复合地氟烷麻醉维持,术毕静脉注射氟马西尼拮抗。两组术中均持续静脉输注瑞芬太尼。主要结局为苏醒时间,次要结局包括术中血液动力学变化、拔管时间、离开手术室的时间、术后恢复室(PACU)停留时间以及围术期其他不良反应的发生情况。 结果 瑞马唑仑组的苏醒时间、拔管时间和离开手术室时间均显著短于丙泊酚组(P < 0.05)[分别为(4.11 ± 1.17)min vs. (8.64 ± 2.77)min、(4.61 ± 1.11)min vs. (9.90 ± 2.81)min和(6.60 ± 2.01)min vs. (11.74 ± 3.11)min];瑞马唑仑组术中低血压和心动过缓的发生率均显著低于丙泊酚组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);两组术后PACU停留时间及术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 瑞马唑仑复合地氟烷全身麻醉联合氟马西尼拮抗用于眼科日间手术麻醉管理,可显著缩短患者的苏醒时间及拔管时间,有助于维持血流动力学稳定,不良反应少,提高眼科日间手术的安全性,值得临床推广应用。

本文引用格式

胡春华 , 王古岩 , 王惠军 , 奚春花 , 张丛雅 , 吴黎黎 . 瑞马唑仑复合地氟烷全身麻醉联合氟马西尼拮抗在眼科日间手术中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024 , 40(4) : 537 -542 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.04.017

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effect of remimazolam combined with desflurane and flumazenil antagonism for anesthesia during ophthalmic day surgery. Methods This is a prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 64 patients undergoing elective general anesthesia with laryngeal mask during ophthalmic day surgery were selected and randomly assigned to propofol group (n = 32) and remimazolam group (n = 32). The propofol group was given propofol anesthesia induction and propofol combined with diflurane anesthesia maintenance; the remazolam group was given remazolam anesthesia induction and remazolam combined with diflurane anesthesia maintenance, and flumazenil antagonism was given intravenously at the end of the operation. Continuous intravenous infusion of remifentanil was administered during surgery in both groups. The primary outcome was emergence time. The secondary outcome included changes in intraoperative hemodynamic parameters,extubation time,time to leaving the operating room, duration of postoperative recovery room (PACU) stay, and the occurrence of other perioperative adverse reactions. Results Emergence time, extubation time, and time to leaving the operating room in remimazolam group were significantly shorter than those in group propofol (P < 0.05) [(4.11 ± 1.17) vs. (8.64 ± 2.77)min, (4.61 ± 1.11) vs. (9.90 ± 2.81)min and (6.60 ± 2.01) vs. (11.74 ± 3.11)min, respectively]. The incidences of intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia in the remimazolam group were significantly lower than that in the propofol group (P < 0.05); There was no statistically difference in the duration of PACU stay and the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P > 0.05). Conclusion Remimazolam combined with desflurane general anesthesia and flumazenil antagonism for anesthesia management in ophthalmic day surgery could significantly shorten the time of emergence and extubation, help to maintain hemodynamic stability with fewer adverse reactions, and improve the safety of ophthalmic daytime surgery, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

参考文献

1 中国医药教育协会眼科委员会,解放军医学科学技术委员会眼科学分会,中国老年医学学会眼科分会.中国眼科日间手术管理专家共识(2021年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2021,57(6):406-414. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20201117-00757
2 PIGNOT G, BRUN C, TOURRET M, et al. Essential elements of anaesthesia practice in ERAS programs[J]. World J Urol, 2022, 40(6):1299-1309. doi:10.1007/s00345-020-03410-w
3 ZHAO P, CUI Y, SUN L, et al. Inhalation of low-dose desflurane prevents the hemodynamic instability caused by target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol during laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2021, 21(1):54. doi:10.3892/etm.2020.9486
4 YOSHIYASU Y, LAO V F, SCHECHTMAN S, et al. Survey of anesthesiologists on anesthetic maintenance techniques and total intravenous anesthesia for endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2020, 10(2):153-158. doi:10.1002/alr.22500
5 KILPATRICK G J. Remimazolam: Non-Clinical and Clinical Profile of a New Sedative/Anesthetic Agent[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2021, 12:690875. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.690875
6 ZHANG X, LI S, LIU J. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate versus propofol during hysteroscopy: single-centre randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2021, 21(1):156. doi:10.1186/s12871-021-01373-y
7 杨婉, 孔令锁, 陈兰仁. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在老年患者无痛胃肠镜检查的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(20):2665-2669. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.20.019
8 安璐, 刘颖, 崔秀花, 等. 氟马西尼拮抗瑞马唑仑全身麻醉术后残余镇静作用的临床观察[J]. 中国医药, 2022,17(12):1846-1849.
9 KIM K M. Remimazolam: pharmacological characteristics and clinical applications in anesthesiology[J]. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul), 2022, 17(1):1-11. doi:10.17085/apm.21115
10 SAHINOVIC M M, STRUYS M, ABSALOM A R. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol[J]. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2018, 57(12):1539-1558. doi:10.1007/s40262-018-0672-3
11 SCHüTTLER J, EISENRIED A, LERCH M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remimazolam (CNS 7056) after Continuous Infusion in Healthy Male Volunteers: Part I. Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Pharmacodynamics[J]. Anesthesiology, 2020, 132(4):636-651. doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000003103
12 JIANG J, HU Z L, BOUCETTA H, et al. Identification of degradation products in flumazenil using LC-Q-TOF/MS and NMR: Degradation pathway elucidation[J]. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2022, 215:114764. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114764
13 王安琪, 王中玉, 王朝阳, 等. 瑞马唑仑复合丙泊酚麻醉对腹腔镜下肝脏部分切除术患者苏醒期恢复质量的影响[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2022, 36(12):1281-1286.
14 OH E J, CHUNG Y J, LEE J H, et al. Comparison of propofol vs. remimazolam on emergence profiles after general anesthesia: A randomized clinical trial[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2023, 90:111223. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111223
15 DEXTER F, HINDMAN B J. Systematic review with meta-analysis of relative risk of prolonged times to tracheal extubation with desflurane versus sevoflurane or isoflurane[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2023, 90:111210. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111210
16 旷光华, 徐伟, 夏瑞. 瑞马唑仑的应用现状及其研究进展[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(13):1695-1700. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2022.13.025
17 NAKANISHI T, SENTO Y, KAMIMURA Y, et al. Remimazolam for induction of anesthesia in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: a prospective, observational pilot study[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2021, 21(1):306. doi:10.1186/s12871-021-01530-3
18 KAWAGOE I, HAYASHIDA M, SATOH D, et al. Comparison of desflurane and propofol in the speed and the quality of emergence from anesthesia in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery-a prospective, randomized study[J]. Transl Cancer Res, 2022, 11(4):736-744. doi:10.21037/tcr-21-2635
文章导航

/