医学检查与临床诊断

增强CT和MRI在鉴别鼻腔鼻窦鳞状细胞癌与淋巴瘤中的应用

  • 陈海静 ,
  • 杨亚英 ,
  • 赵卫 ,
  • 胡继红 ,
  • 吴莉 ,
  • 郑凌琳 ,
  • 吴岩 ,
  • 李青青
展开
  • 昆明医科大学第一附属医院医学影像科 (昆明 650032 )

收稿日期: 2023-07-24

  网络出版日期: 2024-02-22

基金资助

云南省放射与治疗临床医学研究中心专项基金子课题资助项目(202102AA100067);云南省科技厅科技计划基金资助项目(202101AY070001-103)

Contrast⁃enhanced CT and MRI in differentiating squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity and sinuses from lymphoma

  • Haijing CHEN ,
  • Yaying YANG ,
  • Wei ZHAO ,
  • Jihong HU ,
  • Li WU ,
  • Linglin ZHENG ,
  • Yan WU ,
  • Qingqing LI
Expand
  • Department of Radiology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming 650032,China

Received date: 2023-07-24

  Online published: 2024-02-22

摘要

目的 探讨鼻腔鼻窦鳞状细胞癌(SCC)和淋巴瘤(NHL)的增强CT和MRI影像特征,分析不同影像特征鉴别鼻腔鼻窦SCC与NHL的效能。 方法 回顾性分析行鼻窦增强CT和增强MRI检查并经手术病理证实的67例鼻腔鼻窦SCC及NHL患者的影像学及临床、病理资料,分析肿瘤起源部位、最大径、CT密度、MRI信号强度、增强强化程度、肿瘤内部坏死、邻近骨质破坏、对周围组织的侵犯、扫描范围内颈部淋巴结转移情况等影像特征,采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线及曲线下面积(AUC)分析不同影像学特征鉴别鼻腔鼻窦SCC和NHL的效能。 结果 鼻腔鼻窦SCC与NHL的肿瘤起源部位、最大径、肿瘤内部坏死、周围骨质破坏以及周围组织侵犯5个影像学特征组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),鉴别SCC与NHL的AUC分别为0.708、0.694、0.785、0.850、0.629。联合肿瘤起源部位、肿瘤内部坏死、周围骨质破坏3个影像特征鉴别SCC与NHL的AUC为0.969,灵敏度及特异度分别为83.9%及97.2%。 结论 肿瘤起源部位、最大径、肿瘤内部坏死、骨质破坏及周围组织侵犯的增强CT及MRI影像征象有助于鼻腔鼻窦SCC与NHL的鉴别,尤其是出现肿瘤起源于鼻腔、坏死少见、骨质破坏轻微,应优先考虑鼻腔鼻窦NHL的可能。增强CT和MRI有助于鼻腔鼻窦SCC与NHL的鉴别,联合使用有助于提高鉴别诊断效能。

本文引用格式

陈海静 , 杨亚英 , 赵卫 , 胡继红 , 吴莉 , 郑凌琳 , 吴岩 , 李青青 . 增强CT和MRI在鉴别鼻腔鼻窦鳞状细胞癌与淋巴瘤中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024 , 40(3) : 394 -399 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.03.020

Abstract

Objective To investigate the enhanced CT and MRI imaging features of nasal sinus squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and lymphoma (NHL), and to analyze the efficacy of different imaging features in differentiating nasal sinus SCC from NHL. Methods The imaging, clinical and pathological data of 67 patients with sinus SCC and NHL who underwent sinus CT and MRI with contrast CT and MRI in our hospital and confirmed by surgical pathology were retrospectively analyzed, and the tumor origin, maximum diameter, CT density, MRI signal intensity, enhancement degree, tumor internal necrosis, adjacent bone destruction, invasion of surrounding tissues, and The imaging features such as cervical lymph node metastasis within the scanning range were analyzed, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to analyze the efficacy of different imaging features to distinguish nasal sinus SCC and NHL. Results There were statistically significant differences between the five imaging features of nasal sinus SCC and NHL, including tumor origin, maximum diameter, internal tumor necrosis, surrounding bone destruction and peripheral tissue invasion (P < 0.05), and the AUC of differentiating SCC and NHL were 0.708, 0.694, 0.785, 0.850 and 0.629, respectively. The AUC of SCC and NHL was 0.969, and the sensitivity and specificity were 83.9% and 97.2%, respectively. Conclusion On contrast?enhanced CT and MRI, the imaging signs of tumor origin, maximum diameter, tumor internal necrosis, bone destruction and surrounding tissue invasion are helpful to distinguish nasal sinus SCC from NHL, especially if the tumor originates in the nasal cavity, necrosis is rare, bone destruction is mild, and the possibility of nasal sinus NHL should be given priority. Contrast?enhanced CT and MRI can help differentiate nasal sinus SCC from NHL, and the combination can help improve differential diagnostic performance.

参考文献

1 KUMARI S, PANDEY S, VERMA M, et al. Clinicopathological Challenges in Tumors of the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses: Our Experience[J]. Cureus, 2022,14(9):e29128.
2 CARDESA A, ALOS L, NADAL A, et al. Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses[J]. Head Neck Pathol, 2017,2(11):49-127.
3 BINAZZI A, CORFIATI M, DI MARZIO D, et al. Sinonasal cancer in the Italian national surveillance system: Epidemiology, occupation, and public health implications[J]. Am J Ind Med,2018,61(3): 239-250. doi:10.1002/ajim.22789
4 BRACIGLIANO A, TATANGELO F, PERRI F, et al. Malignant Sinonasal Tumors: Update on Histological and Clinical Management[J]. Curr Oncol, 2021,28(4):2420-2438. doi:10.3390/curroncol28040222
5 KIM S H, MUN S J, KIM H J, et al. Differential Diagnosis of Sinonasal Lymphoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma on CT, MRI, and PET/CT[J]. Otolaryng Head Neck, 2018,159(3):494-500. doi:10.1177/0194599818770621
6 MAITRA M, SINGH M K. A Comparative Study on Clinico-radiological Differentiation of Sino-nasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) and Sino-nasal Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma (NHL)[J]. Indian J Otolaryngol, 2022,74(2):142-145. doi:10.1007/s12070-020-02091-6
7 LI F, HE H. Assessing the Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests[J]. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry, 2018,30(3):207-212.
8 方三高. WHO(2017)头颈部肿瘤分类[J]. 诊断病理学杂志,2017,8(33):84-87. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-8096.2017.08.024
9 MANI N, SHAH J P. Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Its Variants[J]. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 2020,84:124-136. doi:10.1159/000457932
10 SHIRAZI N, BIST S S, PURI N, et al. Primary sinonasal lymphoma in immunocompetent patients: A 10 years retrospective clinicopathological study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol, 2018,22(2):280-281. doi:10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_45_17
11 KREISEL F H. Hematolymphoid Lesions of the Sinonasal Tract[J]. Head Neck Pathol, 2016,10(1):109-117. doi:10.1007/s12105-016-0698-5
12 CHATELET F, SIMON F, BEDARIDA V, et al. Surgical Management of Sinonasal Cancers: A Comprehensive Review[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2021,13(16):3995-4015. doi:10.3390/cancers13163995
13 HUANG Y, JIA B, JIANG S, et al. Different clinical characteristics and treatment strategies for patients with localized sinonasal diffuse large B cell lymphoma and extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma[J]. J Hematol Oncol, 2017,10(1):7-11. doi:10.1186/s13045-016-0368-9
14 PULICKAL G G, NAVARATNAM A V, NGUYEN T, et al. Imaging Sinonasal disease with MRI: Providing insight over and above CT[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2018,102:157-168. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.02.033
15 AKAY S, POLLARD J H, SAAD EDDIN A, et al. PET/CT Imaging in Treatment Planning and Surveillance of Sinonasal Neoplasms[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2023,15(15):3759. doi:10.3390/cancers15153759
16 EGGESB H B. Imaging of sinonasal tumours[J]. Cancer Imaging,2012,12:136-152. doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0015
17 徐驰宇, 朱丽, 骆岩林. 鼻窦和鼻颅底手术解剖的历史与进展[J]. 解剖学报, 2020,51(5):732-737.
18 刘心怡,罗益镇,林洁琼,等. 儿童鼻腔鼻窦恶性肿瘤及肿瘤样病变的影像表现[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2022,30(5):451-456. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2022.05.007
19 魏先梅, 麻晓峰, 窦鑫,等. CT和MRI对原发鼻腔鼻窦结外鼻型NK/T细胞淋巴瘤的临床诊断价值[J]. 医学研究生学报,2018,31(5):481-484.
20 袁欣,危春容,冯瑶杰,等. 双源CT碘值及Overlay值鉴别鼻腔鼻窦软组织肿块的价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019,35(24):3842-3847. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2019.24.024
21 BITNER B F, HTUN N N, WANG B Y, et al. Sinonasal lymphoma: A primer for otolaryngologists[J]. Laryngoscope Invest,2022,7(6):1712-1724. doi:10.1002/lio2.941
22 KAWAGUCHI M, KATO H, TOMITA H, et al. Imaging Characteristics of Malignant Sinonasal Tumors[J]. J Clin Med, 2017,6(12):116-130. doi:10.3390/jcm6120116
23 陈晓丽, 鲜军舫. 鼻腔鼻窦肿瘤和肿瘤样病变的影像学分析思路[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2022,56(7):826-830. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20220424-00378
文章导航

/