临床研究

不同频率下全身振动疗法对不随意运动型脑瘫患儿下肢粗大运动及步行功能的影响

  • 张秋 ,
  • 虞记华 ,
  • 李卫平 ,
  • 凌运其 ,
  • 王剑雄 ,
  • 胥方元
展开
  • 西南医科大学附属医院康复医学科,西南医科大学康复医学系,康复医学与工程泸州市重点实验室 (四川 泸州 646000 )

收稿日期: 2023-08-15

  网络出版日期: 2024-02-22

基金资助

四川省科学技术厅社会发展项目(23ZDYF2793)

Effects on different frequencies of whole body vibration on gross motor function and walking function in children with dyskinetic cerebral palsy

  • Qiu ZHANG ,
  • Jihua YU ,
  • Weiping LI ,
  • Yunqi LING ,
  • Jianxiong WANG ,
  • Fangyuan XU
Expand
  • Department of Rehabilitation,the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University,Department of Rehabilition Medicine,Southwest Medical University,Rehabilition Medicine and Engineering Key Laboratory of Luzhou,Luzhou 646000,China

Received date: 2023-08-15

  Online published: 2024-02-22

摘要

目的 基于不同频率下全身振动疗法(whole body vibration, WBV)对不随意运动型脑瘫粗大运动及步行功能的影响,为后续WBV临床推广提供参考意义。 方法 选取2021年10月至2022年11月在西南医科大学附属医院康复医学科门诊和/或入院6 ~ 12岁不随意运动型脑瘫60例,按随机数字表法分为对照组(n = 20)、(25 ± 5)Hz组(n = 20)及(35 ± 5)Hz组(n = 20)。3组均进行常规康复训练,(25 ± 5)Hz组额外接受振动频率为(25 ± 5)Hz的WBV,(35 ± 5)Hz组接受(35 ± 5)Hz的WBV,3组均治疗8周。在治疗前后对3组患儿使用Berg平衡量表(Berg Balance Scale, BBS)、起立-行走计时测试(Time to Up and Go Test, TUGT)、粗大运动功能测试量表(Gross Motor Function Measure-88, GMFM-88)及足印分析法评定疗效。 结果 治疗后3组患儿各项评分指标均优于治疗前(P < 0.001);其中(35 ± 5)Hz组BBS评分(F = 12.502)、TUGT(F = 8.211)、GMFM-88的D区、E区评分(F = 12.802、8.505)、跨步长(F = 12.279)、步宽(F = 13.582)及1 min步行距离(F = 12.619)均优于(25 ± 5)Hz组及对照组(P < 0.05或P < 0.01);(25 ± 5)Hz组疗效优于对照组(P < 0.05或P < 0.01)。 结论 WBV可提高不随意运动型脑瘫儿童躯干控制、改善其下肢粗大运动及步行功能,且(35 ± 5)Hz的WBV疗效优于(25 ± 5)Hz的WBV。

本文引用格式

张秋 , 虞记华 , 李卫平 , 凌运其 , 王剑雄 , 胥方元 . 不同频率下全身振动疗法对不随意运动型脑瘫患儿下肢粗大运动及步行功能的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024 , 40(3) : 353 -359 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.03.013

Abstract

Objective To provide reference for the subsequent clinical application of WBV, based on the impacts of whole body vibration (WBV) with different frequencies on gross motor function and walking function in children with dyskinetic cerebral palsy. Methods 60 children aged 6 ~ 12 with dyskinetic cerebral palsy, who had been treated at the department of rehabilitation medicine in the Affiliated Southwest Medical University from October 2021 to November 2022, were selected. They were randomly divided into a control group (n = 20), (25 ± 5) Hz group (n = 20), and (35 ± 5) Hz group (n = 20). All the three groups received conventional rehabilitation, while the (25 ± 5) Hz group received additional WBV with (25 ± 5) Hz and the (35 ± 5) Hz group received WBV with (35 ± 5) Hz. They were treated for eight weeks. The scores on D and E domains of GMFM-88, TUGT, the score on Berg Balance Scale, and footprint analysis were used for assessment of the efficacy after treatment. Results As compared with the baselines, the scores were improved in the three groups after treatment (P < 0.001). BBS (F = 12.502), TUGT (F = 8.211), scores on D and E domains of GMFM-88 (F = 12.802 and 8.505), stride length (F = 12.279), 1MWT distance (F = 12.619), and step width (F = 13.582) were better in the (35 ± 5) Hz group than in the (25 ± 5) Hz group and the control group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01); and the efficacy was better in the (25 ± 5) Hz group than in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). Conclusion WBV can improve trunk control, lower limb gross motor function, and walking function in children with involuntary motor type cerebral palsy. (35 ± 5) Hz is better than (25 ± 5) Hz for the efficacy of WBV.

参考文献

1 中国康复医学会儿童康复专业委员会,中国残疾人康复协会小儿脑性瘫痪康复专业委员会,中国医师协会康复医师分会儿童康复专业委员会,等. 中国脑性瘫痪康复指南(2022)第一章:概论[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2022,37(12):887-892. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20220505-00500
2 VITRIKAS K, DALTON H, BREISH D. Cerebral Palsy: An Overview[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2020,101(4): 213-220. doi:10.1016/j.cpha.2020.06.004
3 MONBALIU E, HIMMELMANN K, LIN J P, et al. Clinical presentation and management of dyskinetic cerebral palsy[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2017,6(9):741-749. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30252-1
4 DAMIANO D L, LONGO E. Early intervention evidence for infants with or at risk for cerebral palsy: an overview of systematic reviews[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2021, 63(7):771-784. doi:10.1111/dmcn.14855
5 TEKIN F, KAVLAK E. Short and long-term effects of whole-body vibration on spasticity and motor performance in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy[J]. Percept Mot Skills, 2021,128(3):1107-1129. doi:10.1177/0031512521991095
6 HEGAZY R G, ABDEL-AZIEM A A. Effect of whole-body vibration exercise on hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio, walking performance, and postural control in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 2022,45(9):660-670. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2023.04.011
7 唐久来,秦炯,邹丽萍,等. 中国脑性瘫痪康复指南(2015):第一部分[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2015,30(7):747-754.
8 PISCITELLI D, FERRARELLO F, UGOLINI A, et al. Measurement properties of the gross motor function classification system, gross motor function classification system-expanded & revised, manual ability classification system, and communication function classification system in cerebral palsy: a systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2021,63(11):1251-1261. doi:10.1111/dmcn.14910
9 MESEGUER-HENAREJOS A B, RUBIO-APARICIO M, LOPEZ-PINA J A, et al. Characteristics that affect score reliability in the Berg Balance Scale: a meta-analytic reliability generalization study[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2019,55(5):570-584. doi:10.23736/s1973-9087.19.05363-2
10 SMITH J, DIVITO M, FERGUS A. Reliability and discriminant validity of the quantitative timed up and go in typically developing children and children with cerebral palsy GMFCS levels I-II[J]. J Pediatr Rehabil Med,2023,16(1):25-35. doi:10.3233/prm-210034
11 杨亚丽,徐玲,马海霞,等. 正常儿童及脑性瘫痪患儿步行足印参数值研究[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2004, 26(11):37-39. doi:10.3760/j:issn:0254-1424.2004.11.010
12 KITAI Y, HIRAI S, OKUYAMA N, et al. Functional outcomes of children with dyskinetic cerebral palsy depend on etiology and gestational age[J]. Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 2021, 30(1):108-112. doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2020.11.002
13 李俊,周满相,杨孝霞. 本体感觉训练在不随意运动型脑瘫中的疗效分析[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2019, 19(85):95+99.
14 MUNSHI P, KHAN M H, ARORA N K, et al. Effects of plyometric and whole-body vibration on physical performance in collegiate basketball players: a crossover randomized trial[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1):5043-5052. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09142-8
15 SHADLOO N, KAMALI F, SALEHI-DEHNO N. A comparison between whole-body vibration and conventional training on pain and performance in athletes with patellofemoral pain[J]. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2021,27(1):661-666. doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.03.003
16 RUHDE L, HULLA R. An overview of the effects of whole-body vibration on individuals with cerebral palsy[J]. J Pediatr Rehabil Med, 2022,15(1):193-210. doi:10.3233/prm-201508
17 严善钟,金娟,陈世动,等. 全身振动训练对痉挛型脑瘫患儿20例步行速度及粗大运动功能影响研究[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志, 2021, 36(1):33-37.
18 ELSHAFEY M A, ABDRABO M S, ELNAGGAR R K. Effects of a core stability exercise program on balance and coordination in children with cerebellar ataxic cerebral palsy[J]. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 2022, 22(2):172-178.
19 CHEN B, DONG Y, GUO J, et al. effects of whole-body vibration on lumbar-abdominal muscles activation in healthy young adults: a pilot study[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2019, 25(01):1945-1951. doi:10.12659/msm.912720
20 KANG S R, KIM G W, KO M H, et al. The effect of exercise load deviations in whole body vibration on improving muscle strength imbalance in the lower limb[J]. Technol Health Care, 2020, 28(S1):103-114. doi:10.3233/thc-209011
21 CELIK E, FINDIKOGLU G, OZDEMIR- KART S, et al. The adaptations in muscle architecture following whole body vibration training[J]. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 2022, 22(2):193-202.
22 BONANNI R, CARIATI I, ROMAGNOLI C,et al. whole body vibration: a valid alternative strategy to exercise?[J]. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol, 2022, 7(4):99-118. doi:10.3390/jfmk7040099
23 COLSON S S, GIODA J, DA-SIVA F. Whole body vibration training improves maximal strength of the knee extensors, time-to-exhaustion and attenuates neuromuscular fatigue[J]. Sports (Basel), 2023,11(5):94-107. doi:10.3390/sports11050094
24 RITTWEGER J, MUTSCHELKNAUSS M, FELSENBERGe D. Acute changes in neuromuscular excitability after exhaustive whole body vibration exercise as compared to exhaustion by squatting exercise[J]. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging, 2003, 23(2):81-86. doi:10.1046/j.1475-097x.2003.00473.x
25 蒋子豪,王广兰,陈鹏,等. 离心训练结合不同频率全身振动训练治疗髌腱末端病[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2024,28(4):493-498. doi:10.12307/2024.211
26 YOON J Y, KANG S R, KIM H S, et al. Effects of low-frequency whole-body vibration on muscle activation, fatigue, and oxygen consumption in healthy young adults: a single-group repeated-measures controlled trial[J]. J Sport Rehabil, 2022,31(8):984-992. doi:10.1123/jsr.2021-0170
27 PEUNGSUWAN P, CHATCHAWAN U, DONPUNHA W, et al. Different protocols for low whole-body vibration frequency for spasticity and physical performance in children with spastic cerebral palsy[J]. Children (Basel), 2023,10(3):458-470. doi:10.3390/children10030458
28 任满迎. 同振幅下不同频率振动刺激对肌肉力量训练效果的对比研究[D]. 河北师范大学, 2007.
29 陈红,黄雨滟,黄强. 不同频率的全身振动训练对脑卒中患者平衡功能及步行功能的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021,37(16):2160-2163. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.16.026
30 WEI N, CAI M. Optimal frequency of whole body vibration training for improving balance and physical performance in the older people with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Rehabil,2022,36(3):342-349. doi:10.1177/02692155211050564
31 刘韬,蒙利娇,黄敏,等. 局部振动疗法抑制脑卒中后患者痉挛的研究进展[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2021,43(5):465-467. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2021.05.020
32 WUESTEFELD A, FUERMAIER ABM, BERNARDO-FILHO M, et al. Towards reporting guidelines of research using whole-body vibration as training or treatment regimen in human subjects-A Delphi consensus study[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(7):e0235905-e0235935. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235905
文章导航

/