收稿日期: 2023-08-07
网络出版日期: 2024-01-10
基金资助
国家自然科学基金青年项目(82002235)
Application of autoantibody in the diagnosis and treatment of threatened preterm labor
Received date: 2023-08-07
Online published: 2024-01-10
目的 探讨血清中抗磷脂抗体(aPL)(ACA-IgG、ACA-IgM、β2-GPI-IgG、β2-GPI-IgM)、LAC、ds-DNA、ANA的水平与先兆早产的相关性,结合年龄、孕周、生产史、流产史对先兆早产进行预测分析,为先兆早产的防治提供参考,促进优生优育。 方法 通过回顾性研究设计,收集2018年6月至2020年12月在广东省人民医院诊疗的先兆早产孕妇43例为病例组,随机选取同一时期且孕龄相近的健康孕妇47例为对照组。采用酶免仪酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测aPL(ACA-IgG、ACA-IgM、β2-GPI-IgG、β2-GPI-IgM)、ds-DNA等指标,采用凝血仪检测血浆中的狼疮抗凝物(LAC),采用免疫荧光分析仪间接免疫荧光法检测ANA,应用SPSS 24.0软件对一般资料及实验室检测数据进行统计学分析。结合患者年龄、孕周、生产史、流产史等一般资料,进行logistic回归分析,寻找先兆早产相关独立影响因素;采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)进行分析,确定ROC曲线下面积(AUC)、最佳预测值、灵敏度、特异度,对先兆早产进行预测价值分析。 结果 病例组孕妇年龄27 ~ 40岁,平均(29.93 ± 3.91)岁,采血检测时孕周27 ~ 36周,平均(31.96 ± 2.35)周;对照组孕妇年龄25 ~ 40岁,平均(30.74 ± 3.44)岁,采血检测时孕周28 ~ 36周,平均(32.84 ± 2.13)周。病例组孕妇β2-GPI-IgM水平明显高于对照组孕妇,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),而两组β2-GPI-IgG、ds-DNA、LAC水平差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示β2-GPI-IgM AUC为0.642(P < 0.05),是先兆早产的独立影响因素;年龄、孕周、生产史、流产史均不能作为先兆早产的独立影响因素。 结论 β2-GPI-IgM与先兆早产相关,可作为先兆早产的预测指标,在孕妇先兆早产监测中具有临床实用价值。
方伟 , 冯安妮 , 彭兰欢 , 廖玉琴 , 邓倩昀 , 陈柳勤 . 自身抗体在先兆早产诊疗中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023 , 39(24) : 3255 -3260 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.24.019
Objective To investigate the correlation between serum levels of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) (ACA-IgG, ACA-IgM, β2-GPI-IgG, β2-GPI-IgM), LAC, ds-DNA, and ANA and preterm labor with prematurity, and to analyze the prediction of preterm labor with the combination of age, week of gestation, history of delivery, and history of miscarriage, so as to provide references for the prevention and treatment of preterm labor and to promote eugenics. Methods Through a retrospective study design, 43 pregnant women with preterm labor with preeclampsia diagnosed and treated at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital from June 2018 to December 2020 were collected as a case group, and 47 healthy pregnant women of the same period and similar gestational age were randomly selected as a control group. aPL (ACA-IgG, ACA-IgM, β2-GPI-IgG, β2-GPI-IgM) and ds-DNA were detected by enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) using an enzyme immunoassay instrument, lupus anticoagulant (LAC) in plasma was detected by coagulometer, and ANA was detected by indirect immunofluorescence using an immunofluorescence analyzer, and the application of SPSS 24.0 software was used to statistically analyze the general information and laboratory test data. the age of the patients was combined, gestational week, birth history, miscarriage history and other general information, logistic regression analysis was performed to find the independent influencing factors related to preterm labor; the analysis was performed by using the subjects' work characteristic curve (ROC curve) to determine the area under the ROC curve (AUC), the best predictive value, sensitivity and specificity, and to analyze the predictive value of preterm labor with preterm labor. Results In this study, the pregnant women in the group of pregnant women with preterm labor with preeclampsia were aged 27 ~ 40 years, with a mean age of (29.93 ± 3.91) years, and the gestational weeks at the time of blood collection were 27-36 weeks, with a mean gestational week of (31.96 ± 2.35) weeks, while the pregnant women in the healthy control group during the same time period were aged 25 ~ 40 years, with a mean age of (30.74 ± 3.44) years, and the gestational weeks at the time of blood collection were 28 ~ 36 weeks, with a mean gestational week of (32.84 ± 2.13) weeks. In the same period, healthy control group pregnant women were aged 25 ~ 40 years, with a mean age of (30.74 ± 3.44) years, and were 28 ~ 36 weeks pregnant at the time of blood collection. The β2-GPI-IgM level of pregnant women in the case group with preterm labor was significantly higher than that of pregnant women in the healthy control group at the same time, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05), while the differences in the levels of β2-GPI-IgG, ds-DNA, and LAC between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).The analysis of the ROC curves showed that the AUC of β2-GPI-IgM was 0.642 (P < 0.05), which was the highest in the preterm group, and the AUC was 0.642 (P < 0.05). 0.05), which was an independent influencing factor of preterm labor; age, gestational week, labor history, and miscarriage history could not be used as independent influencing factors of preterm labor. Conclusion β2-GPI-IgM is associated with threatened preterm labor,it can be used as a predictor of threatened preterm labor,and has clinical utility in the monitoring of threatened preterm labor in pregnant women.
Key words: threatened preterm labor; autoantibodies; correlation; prediction
| 1 | 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 早产临床诊断与治疗指南(2014)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2014,49(7):485. |
| 2 | 代宏. 宫颈长度测量预测与先兆早产孕妇分娩时间的相关性探究[J]. 心血管外科杂志(电子版), 2018,7(4):105. |
| 3 | 陈晓辉,崔丽艳. 抗磷脂抗体谱与病理妊娠[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2018,41(12):922-927. |
| 4 | ZHOU Z, TENG J, SUN Y,et al. Characteristics of pregnancy complications and treatment in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome in China[J]. Clin Rheunatol, 2019,38(11):3161-3168. |
| 5 | 马睿,任静,张珠博,等. 狼疮抗凝物阳性患者临床数据横断面研究[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2020,38(7):503-507. |
| 6 | 赵波涛. 抗β2-糖蛋白1抗体和抗心磷脂抗体联合分型检测在不良妊娠诊断中的意义[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2019,34(8):1908-1910. |
| 7 | WANG D, LV W, ZHANG S,et al. Advances in the research on anticardiolipin antibody[J]. J Immunol Res, 2019:8380214. |
| 8 | CHAYOUA W, KELCHTERMANS H, GRIS J C,et al.The (non‐)sense of detecting anti‐cardiolipin and anti‐β2glycoprotein I IgM antibodies in the antiphospholipid syndrome[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2020,18(1):169-179. |
| 9 | JAYASENA C N, RADIA U K, FIGUEIREDO M,et al. Reduced Testicular.Steroidogenesis and Increased Semen Oxidative Stress in Male Partners as Novel Markers of Recurrent Miscarriage[J]. Clin Chem, 2019, 65(1): 161-169. |
| 10 | 崔佳,郭莹,高伟,等. 妊娠期Ⅱ型固有淋巴细胞相关分子与抗磷脂抗体表达及对妊娠结果的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019,35(24):3823-3826. |
| 11 | 张蜀澜,吴子燕,张文,等. 抗磷脂综合征病态妊娠患者中抗磷脂抗体谱的临床意义[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志,2017,5(4):226-231. |
| 12 | VEGLIA M, D'IPPOLITO S, MARANA R, et al. Human IgG antinuclear antibodies induce pregnancy loss in mice by increasing immune complex deposition in placental tissue: in vivo study[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol, 2015,74:542-552. |
| 13 | CHEN X, MO M L, HUANG C Y, et al. Association of serum autoantibodies with pregnancy outcome of patients undergoing first IVF/ICSI treatment: a prospective cohort study[J]. J Reprod Immunol, 2017,122:14-20. |
| 14 | ZENG M, WEN P, DUAN J. Association of antinuclear antibody with clinical outcome of patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment: A meta-analysis[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol, 2019,82:e13158. |
| 15 | CHEN S, YANG G, WU P, et al. Antinuclear antibodies positivity is a risk factor of recurrent pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis[J]. Semin Arthritis Rheum, 2020,50:534-543. |
| 16 | CAVALCANTE M B, CAVALCANTE C, SARNO M,et al. Antinuclear antibodies and recurrent miscarriage: Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol, 2020,83:e13215. |
| 17 | AFMAN I E, CRONJé H S, JOUBERT G,et al.Antinuclear antibody testing in obstetric patients[J]. S Afr Med J, 2003,93(12):932-937. |
| 18 | BORELLA E, LOJACONO A, GATTO M,et al. Predictors of maternal and fetal complications in SLE patients: a prospective study [J]. Immunol Res, 2014,60(2/3):170-176. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |