收稿日期: 2023-08-12
网络出版日期: 2024-01-10
基金资助
甘肃省卫生健康行业优秀青年人才科研专项(GSWSQN2021-011)
Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir alafenamide for chronic hepatitis B patients with decompensated cirrhosis
Received date: 2023-08-12
Online published: 2024-01-10
目的 探讨富马酸丙酚替诺福韦(tenofovir alafenamide, TAF)治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者的疗效和安全性。 方法 回顾性分析2022年6月至2023年6月就诊于甘肃省武威肿瘤医院的失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者41例,给予TAF 25 mg/d治疗 24周。主要疗效终点为第24周达到病毒学应答(HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL)的患者比例。其他疗效终点包括自基线至24周ALT、AST、TBIL、CTP评分和MELD评分的变化。安全性方面,观察自基线至24周Scr、eGFR的变化以及不良事件。 结果 41例患者中,男30例73.2%,年龄(53.49 ± 9.27)岁,TAF治疗24周后,90.2%的患者HBV DNA均检测不到, 基线时ALT、AST和TBil中位值分别为50.70 、48.70 U/L和26.40 μmol/L,治疗24周后,ALT、AST和TBil显著降低,分别为31.50 、37.80 U/L和23.80 μmol/L(P<0.05)。58.5%(n = 24)和63.4%(n = 26)的患者CTP评分和MELD评分改善。基线时中位Scr和eGFR分别为58.50 μmol/L和106.15 mL/(min·1.73 m2),治疗期间Scr和eGFR稳定,前后比较差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。治疗期间未发现药物相关不良事件或严重不良事件,也未发生肝移植、肝癌或死亡。 结论 TAF在真实世界中对失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者具有良好的有效性和安全性。
唐海涛 , 王娴 , 晁廷霞 , 王凤梅 , 贾文玲 , 梁春辉 , 张文华 . 富马酸丙酚替诺福韦治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者疗效和安全性[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023 , 39(24) : 3249 -3254 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.24.018
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) in the treatment of patients with decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis. Methods We retrospective analyzed 41 patients with decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis receiving TAF antiviral therapy for 24 weeks at Wuwei Tumor Hospital in Gansu province from June 2022 to June 2023. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving virologic response (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL). Other endpoints included changes in ALT, AST, TBIL, Child-Pugh score (CTP), and MELD score from baseline to week 24. In terms of safety, changes in Scr, eGFR and adverse events from baseline to week 24 were observed. Results Of 41 patients, 73.2% were male (n = 30), with mean age of 53.49 years. 24 weeks after treatment with TAF, HBV DNA was undetectable in 90.2% of the patients. The median levels of ALT, AST and total bilirubin (TBIL) were 50.70 U/L, 48.70 U/L and 26.40 μmol/L respectively at baseline, and reduced significantly to 31.50 U/L, 37.8 U/L and 23.8 μmol/L (P < 0.05) respectively after 24-week therapy with TAF. CTP score was improved in 58.6% of the patients (n = 24), and so was MELD score in 63.4% of the patients (n = 26) at week 24. The median serum creatinine and eGFR were 58.5 μmol/L and 106.15 mL/(min·1.73 m2) respectively at baseline, and creatinine and eGFR were stable during treatment. No drug-related adverse events or severe adverse events occurred during treatment, neither did creatinine and eGFR liver transplantation, HCC or death. Conclusions Our clinical studies demonstrated better effectiveness and safety of TAF for decompensated CHB patients.
Key words: tenofovir alafenamide; hepatitis B; decompensated cirrhosis; efficacy; safety
| 1 | Global progress report on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections, 2021: accountability for the global health sector strategies 2016-2021: actions for impact[EB/OL]. [2022-12-24].. |
| 2 | 胡璇, 李彤, 王玉珊, 等. 丙酚替诺福韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎的临床研究进展[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2021, 30(8): 950-954. |
| 3 | KUMADA T, TOYODA H, YASUD S, et al. Long-term prognosis with or without nucleot(s)ide analogue therapy in hepatitis B virus-related decompensated cirrhosis[J]. J Viral Hepat, 2021, 28(3): 508-516. |
| 4 | AGARWAL K, BRUNETTO M, SETO W K, et al. 96?weeks treatment of tenofovir alafenamide vs tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B virus infection[J]. J Hepatol, 2018, 68(4): 672-681. |
| 5 | MARTIN P, NGUYEN M H, DIETERICH D T, et al. Treatment algorithm for managing chronichepatitis B virus Infection in the united states: 2021 Update[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepato, 2022, 20(8): 1766-1775. |
| 6 | 中华医学会肝病学分会, 中华医学会感染病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2022年版)[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2023, 41(1): 3-28. |
| 7 | European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection[J]. J Hepatol, 2017, 67(2): 370-398. |
| 8 | LIM Y S, LIN C Y, HEO J, et al. SAT442-safety and efficacy of switching to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in virally suppressed chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with hepatic impairment: week 48 results from a phase 2 open label study[J]. J Hepatol, 2020, 73(1): S872. |
| 9 | JANG J W, CHOI J Y, KIM Y S, et al. Effects of virologic response to treatment on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection and decompensated cirrhosis[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepato, 2018, 16(12):1954-1963. |
| 10 | HUNG T H, TSAI C C, LEE H F. Population-based study of entecavir and long-term mortality in chronic hepatitis B-related decompensated liver cirrhosis[J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2019, 43(6): 694-699. |
| 11 | KUMADA T, TOYODA H, YASUDA S, et al. Long-term prognosis with or without nucleot(s)ide analogue therapy in hepatitis B virus-related decompensated cirrhosis[J]. J Viral Hepat, 2021, 28(3): 508-516. |
| 12 | 孙闻续, 肖桂荣, 黄媛, 等. 丙酚替诺福韦的临床应用和药代动力学研究进展[J]. 四川医学, 2023,44(2):199-203. |
| 13 | 闻颖,唐诗. 替诺福韦二吡呋酯治疗慢性乙型肝炎的肾脏安全性[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2020,36(19):2740-2743. |
| 14 | LI J, HU C, CHEN Y, et al. Short-term and long-term safety and efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure associated with hepatitis B[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2021, 21(1): 567. |
| 15 | PENG W, GU H, CHENG D, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus entecavir for treating hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure: real-world study[J]. Front Microbiol, 2023, 14:1185492. |
| 16 | GUO F, NING Z, WANG X, et al. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir alafenamide for chronic hepatitis B patients with decompensated cirrhosis: a real-world study in China[C]. 2022 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases(AASLD), 2022: 267-268. |
| 17 | PENG Y, QI X, GUO X. Child-pugh versus meld score for the assessment of prognosis in liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies [J]. Medicine, 2016, 95(8): 1-29. |
| 18 | ACHARYA G, KAUSHIK R M, GUPTA R, et al. Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, MELD score and MELD-Na score as predictors of short-term mortality among patients with end-stage liver disease in northern india [J]. Inflamm Intest Dis, 2020, 5(1):1-10. |
| 19 | WANG Q, ZHAO H, DENG Y, et al. Validation of baveno VII criteria for recompensation in entecavir-treated patients with hepatitis B-related decompensated cirrhosis[J]. J Hepatol, 2022, 77(6): 1564-1572. |
| 20 | JUNG C Y, KIM H W, AHN S H, et al. Higher risk of kidney function decline with entecavir than tenofovir alafenamide in patients with chronic hepatitis B[J]. Liver Int, 2022, 42(5): 1017-1026. |
| 21 | LIANG L Y, YIP T C, LAI J C, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide is associated with improved alanine aminotransferase and renal safety compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate[J]. J Med Virol, 2022, 94(9): 4440-4448. |
| 22 | GERAGOTELLIS A, PATEL S, SONDERUP M, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide: An initial experience at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa[J]. S Afr Med J, 2022, 112(2):13505. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |