收稿日期: 2023-06-25
网络出版日期: 2023-11-22
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(81901385);广州市科技项目(2023B03J1388)
Remimazolam versus Propofol for children undergoing painless gastroscopy
Received date: 2023-06-25
Online published: 2023-11-22
目的 比较甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚在儿童无痛胃镜检查的有效性和安全性。 方法 收集年龄4 ~ 9岁,ASA分级Ⅰ-Ⅱ级,BMI 18 ~ 30 kg/m2,拟在静脉全身麻醉下行无痛胃镜检查患者129例。采用随机数字表法分为2组:甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑组(R组)与丙泊酚组(P组)。麻醉诱导使用舒芬太尼0.2 μg/kg和盐酸戊乙奎醚0.01 mg/kg。R组给予甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑0.5 mg/kg,P组给予丙泊酚3 mg/kg。记录两组无痛胃镜的首次用药后成功率、心率、血压、脉搏氧饱和度、镇静评分、Narcotrend指数以及入睡时间、苏醒时间和不良反应。 结果 R组和P组无痛胃镜首次用药成功率分别为82.8%和90.8%,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。R组患者在入镜时和退镜后的Narcotrend指数分别是(84.7 ± 10.8)和(86.4 ± 4.3),明显高于P组的(58.9 ± 13.2)和(66.2 ± 5.0)(P < 0.05)。R组患者苏醒时间为(14.2 ± 6.9)min,明显低于P组(23.8 ± 6.7)min(P < 0.05)。R组和P组的注射痛发生率分别为10.9%和52.3%,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。其余入睡时间和不良反应发生率均差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚均能安全有效地应用于儿童无痛胃镜检查,但甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑苏醒更迅速且注射痛发生率更低。
白雪 , 罗昊 , 黄雅莹 , 黄俊祥 , 谭永红 , 宋兴荣 , 李碧莲 . 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚在儿童无痛胃镜检查中的比较[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023 , 39(19) : 2529 -2533 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.19.020
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam vs propofol for children undergoing painless gastroscopy. Methods A total of 129 children aged 4 ~ 9 years, ASAⅠ-Ⅱ, BMI 18 - 30 kg/m2, scheduled for painless gastroscopy under intravenous general anesthesia were divided into two groups by random number table method: remimazolam group (R group) and propofol group (P group). Anesthesia was induced with sufentanil 0.2 μg/kg and penehyclidine hydrochloride 0.01 mg/kg. The patients in R group was given 0.5 mg/kg remimazolam and in P group was given 0.3 mg/kg propofol. The success rate of completing painless gastroscopy, heart rate, blood pressure, pulse oxygen saturation, sedation score, narcotrend index were recorded. The onset time, recovery time of orientation and adverse reactions were observed. Results The success rate of sedation in R group and P group was 82.8% and 90.8% respectively,with no statistically difference (P > 0.05). At the time of endoscopic insertion and the end of endoscopic operation, the narcotrend index value of R group was 84.7 ± 10.8, 86.4 ± 4.3, respectively, which was significantly higher than that of P group (58.9 ± 13.2 and 66.2 ± 5.0) (P < 0.05). The postoperative recovery time of R group was (14.2 ± 6.9) min, which was lower than that of P group (23.8 ± 6.7) min(P < 0.05). The incidence of injection pain in R group and P group was respectively 10.9% and 52.3%, with statistically significant difference(P < 0.05). And the other adverse reactions were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion Both remimazolam and propofol could be safely and effectively used gastroscopy for children, and remimazolam made patients wake up quickly with a lower incidence of injection pain.
Key words: remimazolam; propofol; children; painless gastroscopy
| 1 | 王思聪,陈芳,林函,等.浙江省218家医院儿科麻醉现状调查[J].浙江医学,2022,44(22):2452-2455,2460. |
| 2 | LEE Y M, KANG B, KIM Y B, et al. Procedural Sedation for Pediatric Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Korea[J]. J Korean Med Sci,2021,36(20):e136. |
| 3 | MAHONEY L B, LIGHTDALE J R. The Evolution of Sedation for Pediatric Gastrointestinal Endoscopy[J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am,2023,33(2):213-234. |
| 4 | FATIMA H, IMPERIALE T. Safety Profile of Endoscopist-directed Balanced Propofol Sedation for Procedural Sedation: An Experience at a Hospital-based Endoscopy Unit[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol,2022,56(3):e209-e215. |
| 5 | 张欢欢,谭永红,宋兴荣,等. 纳布啡预防胃肠镜检查术患儿丙泊酚中长链脂肪乳注射痛的量效关系[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志,2021,41(2):195-197. |
| 6 | KEAM S J. Remimazolam: First Approval[J]. Drugs,2020,80(6):625-633. |
| 7 | ZHU H, SU Z, HUAI X, et al. Efficacy and safety of remimazolamtosylate for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials,2022,23(1):995. |
| 8 | CHEN S, WANG J, XU X, et al. The efficacy and safety of remimazolamtosylate versus propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: a multicentered, randomized, positive-controlled, phase III clinical trial[J]. Am J Transl Res,2020,12(8):4594-4603. |
| 9 | 杨海扣,孙剑,王巧,等. 瑞马唑仑和右美托咪定镇静在婴幼儿心脏超声检查中的应用比较[J]. 重庆医学,2021,50(23):4062-4064+4070. |
| 10 | 刘文良,余雪美,熊朝晖. 无痛胃肠镜患者丙泊酚复合舒芬太尼麻醉效果及麻醉复苏情况分析[J]. 河北医学,2023,29(5):872-876. |
| 11 | LIU F, CHENG X, WANG Y, et al. Effect of remimazolamtosilate on the incidence of hypoxemia in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: A bi-center, prospective, randomized controlled study[J]. Front Pharmacol,2023,14:1131391. |
| 12 | 何新华,杨艳敏,郭树彬,等. 中国高血压急症诊治规范[J]. 中国急救医学, 2020,40(9):795-803. |
| 13 | LARSEN L G, WEGGER M, Lé GREVES S, et al. Emergence agitation in paediatric day case surgery: A randomised, single-blinded study comparing narcotrend and heart rate variability with standard monitoring[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2022,39(3):261-268. |
| 14 | SCHüTTLER J, EISENRIED A, LERCH M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remimazolam (CNS 7056) after Continuous Infusion in Healthy Male Volunteers: Part I. Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Pharmacodynamics[J]. Anesthesiology,2020,132(4):636-651. |
| 15 | 肖兴鹏,郭明,马岚,等. 瑞马唑仑-丙泊酚-舒芬太尼用于无痛胃镜检查术患者麻醉的效果[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2021,41(2):192-194. |
| 16 | REX D K, BHANDARI R, DESTA T, et al. A phase Ⅲ study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2018,88(3):427-437.e6. |
| 17 | PASTIS N J, YARMUS L B, SCHIPPERS F, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Remimazolam Compared With Placebo and Midazolam for Moderate Sedation During Bronchoscopy[J]. Chest,2019,155(1):137-146. |
| 18 | SEPúLVEDA P O, EPULEF V, CAMPOS G. Why do We Use the Concepts of Adult Anesthesia Pharmacology in Developing Brains? Will It Have an Impact on Outcomes? Challenges in Neuromonitoring and Pharmacology in Pediatric Anesthesia[J]. J Clin Med,2021,10(10):2175. |
| 19 | HU Q, LIU X, WEN C, et al. Remimazolam: An Updated Review of a New Sedative and Anaesthetic[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther,2022,16:3957-3974. |
| 20 | LE J, RAMSEY L B. Enhancing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic knowledge in pediatrics[J]. Pharmacotherapy,2023,43(7):578. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |