专题报道:结核专题

肺结核治疗过程中IL-6血清表达水平变化分析

  • 谢贝 ,
  • 许婉华 ,
  • 龚兰 ,
  • 杨瑜 ,
  • 董海平 ,
  • 吴玲 ,
  • 孟繁荣 ,
  • 王楠 ,
  • 刘志辉 ,
  • 李华
展开
  • 1.广州市胸科医院肺部疾病研究所
    2.呼吸疾病国家重点实验室 (广州 510095 )
    3.广州市结核病防治所二分所 (广州 510095 )
    4.重症结核科 (广州 510095 )
    2.呼吸疾病国家重点实验室 (广州 510095 )

收稿日期: 2023-07-17

  网络出版日期: 2023-11-22

基金资助

广州市科技计划-重点研发项目(202206010134);广州市卫生健康科技项目(20231A011051);广州市科技计划(202002030152);广州市医学重点学科(2021-2023┫结核病学);国家重点研发计划“病原学与防疫技术体系研究”重点专项(2022YFC2304800)

Analysis of changes in serum expression levels of IL-6 during pulmonary tuberculosis treatment

  • Bei XIE ,
  • WanHua XU ,
  • Lan GONG ,
  • Yu YANG ,
  • Haiping DONG ,
  • ling WU ,
  • Fanrong MENG ,
  • Nan WANG ,
  • Zhihui LIU ,
  • Hua. LI
Expand
  • *.Institute of Pulmonary Diseases,Guangzhou Chest Hospital Guangzhou 510095,China
    *.ICU of tuberculosis,Guangzhou Chest Hospital,Guangzhou 510095,China

Received date: 2023-07-17

  Online published: 2023-11-22

摘要

目的 探究血清中白介素-6(IL-6)水平在肺结核治疗过程中的变化趋势及影响因素。 方法 分别收集56位肺结核患者治疗前、治疗2个月(强化期结束)和治疗6个月时血清,通过流式细胞术测量其中IL-6的表达水平。 结果 肺结核患者治疗期间血清中IL-6的表达水平呈降低趋势,且其表达水平差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.000)。ROC曲线分析显示,治疗前和治疗2个月时,血清中IL-6表达水平差异的线下面积为0.627,界值为3.840,鉴别的灵敏度为71.40%,特异度为51.80%。二元logistic回归显示治疗2个月后血清中IL-6表达水平是否降低至3.840 pg/mL以下与治疗周期、年龄有关。治疗前IL-6的血清表达水平在有无空洞组、治疗周期为6个月组和12个月组、治疗2个月时对比未治疗前影像学病灶吸收组和无明显变化组、治疗前病原学检查结果阴阳性组之间的差异具有统计学意义。治疗2个月时,IL-6的血清表达水平在不同年龄组、不同治疗周期组、治疗前及治疗2个月时病原学检查结果阴阳性组之间的差异具有统计学意义。治疗6个月时,IL-6的血清表达水平在是否有糖尿病组、不同治疗周期组、治疗6个月时病原学检查结果阴阳性组之间的差异具有统计学意义。ROC曲线分析显示,将入组病例限制到治疗前病原学阳性时,治疗6个月和治疗2个月血清中IL-6表达水平差异的线下面积为0.805,界值为5.450,鉴别的灵敏度为81.25%,特异度为75.00%;当将入组病例年龄限制到44岁及以下时,治疗2个月和治疗前、治疗6个月和治疗2个月血清中IL-6表达水平差异的线下面积分别为0.726、0.721,界值分别为3.840、3.755,鉴别的灵敏度均为70.59%,特异度分别为70.59%、67.65%。 结论 肺结核治疗过程中IL-6在血清中的表达水平呈下降趋势,其水平与患者肺部有无空洞、病原学结果、年龄、病情进展、是否合并糖尿病等有关。

本文引用格式

谢贝 , 许婉华 , 龚兰 , 杨瑜 , 董海平 , 吴玲 , 孟繁荣 , 王楠 , 刘志辉 , 李华 . 肺结核治疗过程中IL-6血清表达水平变化分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023 , 39(19) : 2434 -2439 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.19.004

Abstract

Objective To explore the trend and influencing factors of serum IL-6 level in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods The serum of 56 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis was collected before treatment, 2 months of treatment (the end of the intensive period) and 6 months of treatment, and the expression level of IL-6 was measured by flow cytometry. Results The expression level of IL-6 in serum during treatment in tuberculosis patients tended to decrease, and the expression level was statistically significant (P = 0.000). ROC curve analysis showed that before treatment and 2 months of treatment, the subline area of IL-6 concentration difference in serum was 0.627, the cut-off value was 3.840, the sensitivity for discrimination was 71.40%, and the specificity was 51.80%. Binary logistic regression showed that whether the serum IL-6 concentration decreased to less than 3.840 pg/mL after 2 months of treatment was related to treatment cycle and age. The difference between the serum concentration of IL-6 before treatment was statistically significant between the group with or without cavitation, the treatment period group with 6 months and 12 months, and the group with no significant change in imaging lesions before treatment at 2 months, and the negative group with positive etiological test results before treatment. At 2 months of treatment, the difference between serum concentrations of IL-6 was statistically significant between different age groups, different treatment cycle groups, and the group with negative etiological test results before treatment and at 2 months of treatment. At 6 months of treatment, the difference between the serum concentration of IL-6 was statistically significant in the group with diabetes, in the group with different treatment cycles, and in the group with negative etiological test results at 6 months of treatment. ROC curve analysis showed that when the enrolled cases were limited to positive etiology before treatment, the off-line area of the difference in serum IL-6 concentration between 6 months of treatment and 2 months of treatment was 0.805, the cut-off value was 5.450, the sensitivity for discrimination was 81.25%, and the specificity was 75.00%. When the age of the enrolled cases was limited to 44 years and below, the off-line areas of IL-6 concentration differences in serum after 2 months of treatment and before treatment, 6 months of treatment and 2 months of treatment were 0.726 and 0.721, the cut-off values were 3.840 and 3.755, and the sensitivity and specificity were 70.59% and 67.65%, respectively. Conclusion During the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis, the concentration of IL-6 in serum show a downward trend, and its level is related to whether the patient's lungs have cavities, etiological results, age, disease progression, and whether diabetes is present.

参考文献

1 WHO, WHO Global tuberculosis report[R]. 2022.
2 SIMMONS J D, STEIN C M, SESHADRI C, et al. Immunological mechanisms of human resistance to persistent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection[J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2018, 18(9):575-589.
3 LIU C H, LIU H, GE B. Innate immunity in tuberculosis: host defense vs pathogen evasion[J]. Cellular & Molecular Immunology, 2017, 14(12).
4 RINCON M. Interleukin-6: from an inflammatory marker to a target for inflammatory diseases[J]. Trends Immunol, 2012,33(11):571-577.
5 HUNTER C A, JONES S A. IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease[J]. Nat Immunol, 2015,16(5):448-457.
6 JOSHI L, PONNANA M, SIVANGALA R, et al. Evaluation of TNF-Α, IL-10 and IL-6 cytokine production and their correlation with genotype variants amongst tuberculosis patients and their household contacts[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(9):e0137727.
7 BONI F G, HAMDI I, KOUNDI L M, et al. Cytokine storm in tuberculosis and IL-6 involvement[J]. Infect Genet Evol, 2022,97:105166.
8 GUPTE A N, KUMAR P, ARAúJO-PEREIRA M, et al. Baseline IL-6 is a biomarker for unfavourable tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a multisite discovery and validation study[J]. Eur Respir J, 2022,59(4):2100905.
9 SIGAL G B, SEGAL M R, MATHEW A, et al. Biomarkers of tuberculosis severity and treatment effect: a directed screen of 70 host markers in a randomized clinical trial[J]. EBioMedicine, 2017,25:112-121.
10 KUMAR N P, MOIDEEN K, NANCY A, et al. Plasma chemokines are baseline predictors of unfavorable treatment outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2021,73(9):e3419-e3427.
11 GUPTE A N, SELVARAJU S, GAIKWAD S, et al. Higher interleukin-6 levels and changes in transforming growth factor-β are associated with lung impairment in pulmonary tuberculosis[J]. ERJ Open Res, 2021,7(1):00390-2020.
12 CASARINI M, AMEGLIO F, ALEMANNO L, et al. Cytokine levels correlate with a radiologic score in active pulmonary tuberculosis[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1999,159(1):143-148.
13 MESQUITA E D, GIL-SANTANA L, RAMALHO D, et al. Rede-TB Study group. Associations between systemic inflammation, mycobacterial loads in sputum and radiological improvement after treatment initiation in pulmonary TB patients from Brazil: a prospective cohort study[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2016,16:368.
14 梁津, 刘轾彬, 梁成员,等. 初诊活动性肺结核患者血浆IL-6,IL-17,IL-37及TIM-3水平表达及其临床意义[J]. 现代检验医学杂志, 2021,06:039.
15 张信鸽, 刘新, 赵丹晖. IFN-γ、IL-6、sIL-2R在初治型肺结核患者血清中的变化意义研究[J]. 分子诊断与治疗杂志, 2020, 12(6):4.
16 李晋, 周春霞, 张淋,等. IL-6在结核患者血浆中的表达及临床意义[J]. 中国热带医学, 2020, 20(3):4.
17 RAMBARAN S, NAIDOO K, LEWIS L, et al. Effect of inflammatory cytokines/chemokines on pulmonary tuberculosis culture conversion and disease severity in HIV-Infected and -Uninfected individuals from south Africa[J]. Frontiers in Immunology, 2021, 2021:641065.
18 PAVAN K N, KADAR M, BANUREKHA V V, et al. Plasma proinflammatory cytokines are markers of disease severity and bacterial burden in pulmonary tuberculosis[J]. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2019, 2019(7):7.
19 MARTINEZ A N, SMRITI M, DEEPAK K. Role of interleukin 6 in innate immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection[J]. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2013, 2013(8):1253-1261.
20 SAUNDERS B M, FRANK A A, ORME I M, et al. Interleukin-6 induces early gamma interferon production in the infected lung but is not required for generation of specific immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculos is infection[J]. Infection and Immunity, 2000, 68(6):3322-3326.
文章导航

/