收稿日期: 2023-04-18
网络出版日期: 2023-09-27
基金资助
甘肃省卫生健康行业科研计划(GSWSKY2020-13)
Effect of different antihypertensive therapy levels on combined cardiovascular events in elderly patients with hypertension
Received date: 2023-04-18
Online published: 2023-09-27
目的 探讨不同降压水平对老年高血压患者复合心血管事件的影响。 方法 采用回顾性队列研究方法,对2010年1 月至2020年1月的老年高血压患者(65 ~ 95岁)449例的临床资料进行分析。根据患者入组前1年的临床实际降压数据分入1组224例(收缩压110 ~ 130 mmHg)和2组225例(收缩压130 ~ 150 mmHg),以两组患者主要复合心血管结局事件包括急性冠脉综合征、卒中、急性失代偿性心力衰竭、心血管死亡为主要研究重点。采用Fine-Gray方法比较竞争风险,应用Cox比例风险模型计算死亡风险,分析两组血压水平对老年高血压患者复合心血管事件的影响。 结果 1组(收缩压110 ~ 130 mmHg)21例(9.3%)患者发生了主要复合心血管结局事件,2组(收缩压130 ~ 150 mmHg)28例(12.4%)患者发生了主要复合心血管结局事件(HR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.61 ~ 0.94, P = 0.006)。1组的主要复合心血管事件发生率显著低于2组,绝对差异3.1%。主要复合结局事件中的单项事件的结果也有利于1组:急性冠脉综合征(HR = 0.71,95%CI:0.48 ~ 0.96)、卒中(HR = 0.68,95%CI:0.46 ~ 0.95)、急性失代偿性心力衰竭(HR = 0.27,95%CI:0.08 ~ 0.98)、心血管死亡(HR = 0.57, 95%CI:0.39 ~ 0.85)、全因死亡(HR = 0.93,95%CI:0.54 ~ 0.97),1组的获益均显著优于2组。 结论 对年龄超过65岁的高血压患者,收缩压110 ~ 130 mmHg较收缩压130 ~ 150 mmHg显著降低心血管事件的发生率。
黄慧 , 苏金虎 , 吴冰 . 不同降压水平对老年高血压患者复合心血管事件的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023 , 39(17) : 2225 -2229 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.17.013
Objective To investigate the effect of different antihypertensive therapy levels on composite cardiovascular events in older patients with hypertension. Methods This retrospective study recruited 449 older patients with hypertension (65 ~ 95 years old) who were taking continuous antihypertensive treatment between January 2010 and January 2020. The patients were divided into two groups according to practical blood pressure data for at least one year: group1 224 cases (SBP 110 ~ 130 mmHg) and group 2 225 cases (SBP 130 ~ 150 mmHg). The primary composite outcome was a composite of acute coronary syndrome, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, and death from cardiovascular causes. The hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P value were estimated using the Fine?Gray subdistribution hazard model. The Cox regression model was employed for deaths from any cause. To analyze the effect of two groups antihypertensive therapy levels on the risk of cardiovascular events. Results Primary composite outcome events occurred in 21 of 224 patients (9.3%) in group1(SBP 110 ~ 130 mmHg), as compared with 28 of 225 patients (12.4%) in group 2 (SBP 130 ~ 150 mmHg) (HR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.61 ~ 0.94, P = 0.06). The incidence of primary composite outcome events was significantly lower in group1 than in group 2, with an absolute difference of 3.1 percentage points. The results for individual event of the primary composite outcomes also favored group1. acute coronary syndrome (HR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.48 ~ 0.96), stroke (HR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.46 ~ 0.95), acute decompensated heart failure (HR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.08 ~ 0.98), cardiovascular death (HR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.39 ~ 0.85), and all cause death (HR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.54 ~ 0.97). The benefit of group1 was significantly better than group 2. Conclusion Systolic blood pressure of 110 ~ 130 mmHg significantly reduces the incidence of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients over the age of 65 when compared to 130 ~ 150 mmHg.
| 1 | 李苏宁, 陈祚, 王增武, 等. 我国老年人高血压现状分析[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2019, 27(2):140-148. |
| 2 | Risk Factor Collaboration(NCD-RisC) NCD. Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants[J]. Lancet, 2017, 389(10064):37-55. |
| 3 | LEWINGTON S, LACEY B, CLARKE R, et al. The burden of hypertension and associated risk for cardiovascular mortality in China[J]. JAMA Intern Med, 2016, 176(4):524-532. |
| 4 | 黄珊, 杨洋, 孟庆雯, 等. 收缩压和舒张压的时间变化速率与老年高血压患者颈动脉粥样硬化的关系[J].实用医学杂志, 2019, 35(12):1944-1947. |
| 5 | BOWMAN T S, SESSO H D, GAZIANO J M. Effect of age on blood pressure Parameters and risk of cardiovascular death in men[J]. AM J Hypertens, 2006, 19(1):47-52. |
| 6 | QASEEM A, WILT T J, RICH R, et al. Pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in adults aged 60 years or older to higher versus lower blood pressure targets: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2017, 166(6):430-437. |
| 7 | WILLIAMS B, MANCIA G, SPIERING W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension[J]. Eur Heart J, 2018, 39(33):3021-3104. |
| 8 | WHELTON P K, CAREY R M, ARONOW W S, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in a adults: a report of the american college of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018, 71(19):2199-2269. |
| 9 | 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会, 刘力生.中国高血压防治指南(2018年修订版)[J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2019, 24(1):24-56. |
| 10 | 杨卉, 孔建华,路菲,等.步速与住院老年高血压患者全因死亡的相关性[J].实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(3):395-399. |
| 11 | BECKETT N S, PETERS R, FLETCHER A E, et al. Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358(18):1887-1898. |
| 12 | OGIHARA T, SARUTA T, RAKUGI H, et al. Target blood pressure for treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: valsartan in elderly isolated systolic hypertension study[J]. Hypertension, 2010, 56(2):196-202. |
| 13 | LAYNE A S, HSU F C, BLAIR S N, et al. Predictors of Change in Physical Function in Order Adults in Response to Long-term, Structured Physical Activity: THE LIFE Study[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2017, 98(1):11-24. |
| 14 | MESSERLI F H, BANGALORE S, MESSERLI A W. Age, blood pressure targets, and guidelines: rift between those who preach, those who teach, and those who treat?[J]. Circulation, 2018, 138(2):128-130. |
| 15 | FINE J P, GRAY R J. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk[J]. J Am Stat Assoc, 1999, 94:496-509. |
| 16 | SPRINT Research Group, LEWIS C E, FINE L J, et al. Final report of a trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control[J]. N Engl J Med, 2021,384(20):1921-1930. |
| 17 | MUSINI V M, TEJANI A M, BASSETT K, et al. Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in adults 60 years or older[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 6(6):CD000028. |
| 18 | MURAD M H, LARREA-MANTILLA L, HADDAD A, et al. Antihypertensive Agents in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2019, 104(5):1575-1584. |
| 19 | CHI G, JAMIL A, JAMIL U, et al. Effect of intensive versus standard blood pressure control on major adverse cardiac events and serious adverse events: a bivariate analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Clin Exp Hypertens, 2018, 10:1-8. |
| 20 | WILLIAMSON J D, SUPIANO M A, APPLEGATE W B, et al. Intensive vs standard blood pressure control and cardiovascular disease outcomes in adults aged ≥75 years: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(24):2673-2682. |
| 21 | ZHANG Y, ZHANG X, LIU L, et al. Is a systolic blood pressure target < 140 mmHg indicated in all hypertension? Subgroup analyses of findings from the randomized FEVER trial[J]. Eur Heart J, 2011, 32(12):1500-1508. |
| 22 | 许建忠. 从循证看老年高血压降压目标值[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2020, 22(1):4-6. |
| 23 | ZHANG W, ZHANG S, DENG Y, et al. Trial of intensive blood-pressure control in older patients with hypertension[J]. N Engl J Med, 2021, 385(14):1268-1279. |
| 24 | 国家卫生健康委员会疾病预防控制局,国家心血管病中心,中国医学科学院阜外医院,等. 中国高血压健康管理规范[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2020, 48(1):10-46. |
| 25 | UNGER T, BORGHI C, CHARCHAR F, et al. 2020 International society of hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines[J]. J Hypertens, 2020, 38(6):982-1004. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |