实用医学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (19): 2497-2500.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2021.19.013

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单髁置换术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎的疗效对比

王文 王敏 孟庆奇 陈亮 李斯明   

  1. 广州市红十字会医院,暨南大学附属广州红十字会医院骨科(广州 510220)

  • 出版日期:2021-10-10 发布日期:2021-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 王敏 E⁃mail:wangmin4966@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技创新委员会民生重大专项项目(编号:201704020145);广州市中医药和中西医结合项目(编号:20202A011011)

Curative effect comparisonof unicondylar replacement and high tibial osteotomy in treatment of osteoar⁃ thritis of medial compartment of knee

WANG Wen,WANG Min,MENG Qingqi,CHEN Liang,LI Siming.   

  1. De⁃ partment of Orthopedics,Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital Affiliated to Ji’nan University School of Medicine,Guang⁃ zhou 510220,China

  • Online:2021-10-10 Published:2021-10-10
  • Contact: WANG Min E⁃mail:wangmin4966@163.com

摘要:

目的 对比单髁置换术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎的疗效。方法 选取我院 2017 1 月至 2020 12 月收治的 40 例膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎患者为研究对象,根据患者意愿分为单髁置换组、胫骨高位截骨组各20例,单髁置换组采取单髁置换术治疗,胫骨高位截骨组采取胫骨 高位截骨术治疗,对比两组膝关节活动度、膝关节功能评分、生存质量评分、并发症发生率差异。结果 术前两组患者膝关节活动度、膝关节功能评分、生存质量评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),术后 1 个月膝关节活动度、膝关节功能评分、生存质量评分均较本组术前升高,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05),单髁置 换组生存质量评分与胫骨高位截骨组数值相当,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),膝关节活动度小于胫骨高 位截骨组,膝关节功能评分大于胫骨高位截骨组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);两组并发症发生率差 异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论 在膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎临床治疗中单髁置换术较胫骨高位截骨 术更有助于提升膝关节功能,但不足之处在于膝关节活动度较差。

关键词:

膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎, 单髁置换术, 胫骨高位截骨术, 膝关节功能

Abstract:

Objective To compare the efficacy of unicondylar replacement and high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the knee. Methods We selected 40 patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2020 as the research objects. According to patient′s wishes,they were divided into unicondyle replacement group and high tibial osteotomy group with 20 cases in each. The two groups were compared in terms of inflammatory cytokines,knee joint range of motion,knee joint function score,quality of life score,and complication rate. Results There was no significant difference in knee range of motion,knee function scores,and quality of life score between the two groups before surgery(P > 0.05). Knee range of motion,knee function scores,and quality of life scores were all higher 1 month after surgery and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). The quality of life score in the two groups showed nostatistical significance(P > 0.05). Knee joint function score was higher inunicondyle replacement group than that in the high tibial osteotomy group,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). The compli⁃ cation rate of the two groups was the same,indicating no statistical significance(P > 0.05). Conclusion In clinical treatment of osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the knee,unicondyle replacement is more helpful than high tibial osteotomy to improve knee joint function,but its disadvantage is that the knee joint has poor mobility.

Key words:

medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee, unicondylar replacement, high tibial oste? otomy, knee joint function