实用医学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 525-530.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.03.022

• 论著·临床实践 • 上一篇    

磷丙泊酚二钠和丙泊酚对无痛超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术患者全麻期间血流动力学的影响

胡梦蓉,黄儒文,李芮,林小芬,万卿()   

  1. 贵州医科大学附属肿瘤医院麻醉科 (贵州 贵阳 550001 )
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-14 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-09
  • 通讯作者: 万卿 E-mail:34219463@qq.com

Effects of fospropofol disodium and propofol on hemodynamic responses during anesthesia induction in painless endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration

Mengrong HU,Ruwen HUANG,Rui LI,Xiaofen LIN,Qing WAN()   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology,the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University,Guiyang 550001,Guizhou,China
  • Received:2025-10-14 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-09
  • Contact: Qing WAN E-mail:34219463@qq.com

摘要:

目的 比较磷丙泊酚二钠与丙泊酚用于患者无痛超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)麻醉诱导期间的血流动力学变化及安全性。 方法 纳入择期行无痛EBUS-TBNA检查患者68例,年龄40 ~ 65岁,ASA分级Ⅰ—Ⅲ级,采用随机数字序列法按1∶1比例随机分为磷丙泊酚二钠组(F组,n = 34)和丙泊酚组(P组,n = 34),麻醉诱导:静脉注射舒芬太尼0.3 μg/kg后,F组静脉注射磷丙泊酚二钠12.5 mg/kg,P组静注丙泊酚2 mg/kg,推注时间均为1 min,待患者改良镇静/警觉评分(MOAA/S)评分≤ 1后静脉注射罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg,1 min后置入喉罩行机械通气。记录两组患者入室(T0)、诱导后1 min(T1)、喉罩置入后即刻(T2)、纤支镜通过声门时(T3)、检查结束时(T4)、拔管后3 min(T5)6个时间点的平均动脉压(MAP)及心率(HR)、脑电双频谱指数(BIS)值、术中维持药物及血管活性药物用量、镇静成功率及不良反应发生率。 结果 与P组相比,F组在T1和T4时点MAP明显增高(P < 0.05);术中低血压发生率明显降低(P < 0.05);麻黄碱总用量明显减少(P < 0.05)。与P组相比,F组意识消失时间显著延长(P < 0.05),感觉异常发生率明显升高(P < 0.05),但注射痛发生率明显降低(P < 0.01)。两组患者术中BIS值、心率、镇静成功率、苏醒时间、心动过缓、心动过速发生率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 与丙泊酚相比,磷丙泊酚二钠用于EBUS-TBNA检查全麻期间能使血流动力学更稳定,显著降低低血压和注射痛的发生率;但其诱导时间较长,且会带来皮肤瘙痒、感觉异常等风险。

关键词: 磷丙泊酚二钠, 超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术, 全身麻醉, 血流动力学

Abstract:

Objective To compare the hemodynamic changes and safety of fospropofol disodium and propofol during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing painless endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Methods Sixty-eight patients scheduled for elective painless EBUS-TBNA, aged 40 ~ 65 years with ASA physical status Ⅰ - Ⅲ, were enrolled and randomly allocated (1∶1) to the fospropofol disodium group (F group, n = 34) or the propofol group (P group, n = 34) using a random number table. Anesthesia induction was performed with intravenous sufentanil (0.3 μg/kg), followed by fospropofol disodium (12.5 mg/kg, F group) or propofol (2 mg/kg, P group) within 1 min. Rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) was administered when the modified observer′s assessment of alertness/sedation scale (MOAA/S) score was ied observerd observerhen the modified observerd transbronchial needle aventilation. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and bispectral index (BIS) were recorded at six time points: entering the operating room (T0), 1 min after induction (T1), immediately after laryngeal mask insertion (T2), bronchoscope passing through the glottis (T3), at the end of the EBUS-TBNA procedure (T4), and 3 min after extubation (T5). Intraoperative sedative and vasoactive drug consumption, sedation success rate, and incidence of adverse events were also assessed. Results Compared with the P group, the F group showed significantly higher MAP at T1 and T4P < 0.05), a lower incidence of intraoperative hypotension (P < 0.05), and reduced total ephedrine use (P < 0.05). The F group had a significantly longer time to loss of consciousness (P < 0.05), higher incidence of paresthesia (P < 0.05), and lower incidence of injection pain (P < 0.01). No significant differences were observed between groups in BIS,HR, sedation success rate, recovery time, or incidence of bradycardia and tachycardia (all P > 0.05). Conclusion Compared with propofol, fospropofol disodium provides more stable hemodynamics during general anesthesia for EBUS-TBNA, significantly reducing the incidence of hypotension and injection pain; however, it has a longer induction time and is associated with risks such as skin pruritus and paresthesia.

Key words: fospropofol disodium, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration, general anesthesia, hemodynamics

中图分类号: