实用医学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 637-642.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2021.05.016

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

药物涂层球囊与药物洗脱支架治疗异质性支架内再狭窄的临床疗效分析

李英肖, 宋学莲, 吕彩霞, 谢悦陶, 张飞飞,党懿   

  1. 河北省人民医院1 心血管内科,2 老年科(石家庄 050051)

  • 出版日期:2021-03-10 发布日期:2021-03-10
  • 通讯作者: 党懿 E⁃mail:dangyiemail@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    河北省科技厅重点研发计划项目(编号:18277791D)

Clinical efficacy of drug⁃coated balloon versus drug⁃eluting stent for treatment of in⁃stent restenosis with heterogeneous neointimal pattern

LI Yingxiao,SONG Xuelian,LÜ Caixia,XIE Yuetao,ZHANG Feifei, DANG Yi.   

  1. Department of Cardiology,Hebei General Hospital,Shijiazhuang 050051,China

  • Online:2021-03-10 Published:2021-03-10
  • Contact: DANG Yi E⁃mail:dangyiemail@126.com

摘要:

目的 探讨药物涂层球囊(DCB)与药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗药物洗脱支架术后光学相干断层显像显示异质性再狭窄的临床疗效。方法 回顾分析2017年1月至2018年12月冠脉造影诊断支架内再狭窄且光学相干断层显像显示异质性内膜患者,依据介入术中接受的治疗分为DCB组(n=6)和DES组(n=12)。收集临床资料,记录随访期主要不良心血管事件,包括心源性死亡、非致死性心梗、支架内血栓、靶血管再次重建发生。结果 DCB组与DES组临床基线资料相比无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组冠脉造影示靶血管、术前参考血管直径、病变长度、狭窄程度相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后DCB组残余狭窄百分比更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组光学相干断层显像检查支架内面积、管腔面积、新生内膜面积、新生内膜负荷、脂质斑块及血栓比例相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。DES组术后管腔面积大于DCB组患者(P<0.05)。DCB组随访时间14(13,16.5)个月,DES组随访时间20(16,24)个月,随访期内两组均无MACE发生。结论 DCB及DES可安全有效的用于治疗DES术后异质性再狭窄病变。

关键词:

支架内再狭窄, 异质性内膜, 药物涂层球囊, 药物洗脱支架, 光学相干断层显像

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the efficacy of drug⁃coated balloon(DCB)versus drug⁃eluting stent (DES)for the treatment of in⁃stent restenosis(ISR)with heterogeneous neointimal pattern. Methods In⁃stent restenosis patients with heterogeneous neointimal pattern who had been confirmed by coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography from January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively studied. The patients were assigned to DCB group(n = 6)or DES group(n = 12)according to the therapeutic strategies. The clinical data were collected. Major adverse cardiovascular events(MACEs)including cardiac death,nonfatal myocardial infrac⁃ tion,target vessel revascularization,and stent thrombosis were recorded during the period of follow ⁃ up. Results The clinical baseline data had no statistical difference between DCB group and DES group(P > 0.05). The target vessels showed by coronary angiography and the diameter of the preoperative reference vessels,length of lesions and degree of stenosis did not differ statistically the two groups(P > 0.05). The percentage of residual stenosis was postoperatively higher(P < 0.05)in DCB group than in DES group;there were no statistical difference in the areas of in ⁃stent,vascular lumen and neointima,neointimal load,lipid plaque,and thrombus ratio between the two groups(P > 0.05);the area of vascular lumen was larger in DES group than in DCB group(P < 0.05). The follow⁃period last 14(13,16.5)months in DCB group and 20(16,24)months in DCB group. No MACEs occurred in both groups during the follow⁃up period. Conclusions Both DCB and DES are safe and effective in treatment of IRS with heterogeneous neointimal pattern.

Key words:

in ? stent restenosis, heterogeneous intima, drug ? coated balloon, drug ? eluting stent, optical coherence tomography