实用医学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (19): 3072-3077.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.19.017

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    

非逆行插管联合部分无管化经皮肾镜取石术的安全性与有效性

杨光远1,孙晓松2,乾孝园2,梁复超2,秦凌辉2()   

  1. 1.武汉科技大学医学部医学院 (湖北 武汉 430000 )
    2.湖北文理学院附属襄阳市中心医院泌尿外科 ;(湖北 襄阳 441000 )
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-05 出版日期:2025-10-10 发布日期:2025-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 秦凌辉 E-mail:347801213@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省自然科学基金项目(2023AFB866)

Safety and efficacy of non⁃retrograde intubation combined with partially tubeless PCNL

Guang yuan YANG1,Xiaosong SUN2,Xiaoyuan QIAN2,Fuchao LIANG2,Linghui. QIN2()   

  1. *.School of Medicine,Medical Department,Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430000,Hubei,China
  • Received:2025-08-05 Online:2025-10-10 Published:2025-10-10
  • Contact: Linghui. QIN E-mail:347801213@qq.com

摘要:

目的 评估非逆行插管联合部分无管化经皮肾镜取石术(NR-ST-PCNL)的安全性与有效性。 方法 回顾性分析2023年10月至2025年6月湖北文理学院附属襄阳市中心医院采用经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)治疗合并一定肾积水(肾盂分离度> 10 mm)的上尿路结石患者213例,入选病例分为两组。A组(非逆行插管)109例,B组(逆行插管)104例。主要观察终点为术后并发症。次要观察终点为手术时间、结石清除率、疼痛视觉模拟评分、术后住院时间和住院费用。 结果 A组在术后并发症[7.3%(8/109)vs. 18.3%(19/104),P = 0.017]、手术时间[51.00(37.00,65.00)min vs. 71.50(55.00,90.75)min,P < 0.001)]、术后VAS评分[1.00(0.00,1.00) vs. 1.00(0.00,2.00),P = 0.008]、术后住院时间[3.00(2.00,3.00)d vs. 4.00(4.00,4.00)d,P < 0.001]、住院费用[17 028.00(15 178.05,17 934.50)元 vs. 20 653.00(19 176.25,22 630.00),P < 0.001]低于B组。两组在结石清石率比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 对于肾盂分离度> 10 mm的上尿路结石患者,由经验丰富的术者实施NR-ST-PCNL,在结石清除率与传统术式相当的前提下,可降低并发症风险、缩短手术与住院时间并减少医疗支出,是一种安全高效的临床优化方案。

关键词: 非逆行插管, 部分无管化, 经皮肾镜取石术, 肾盂分离度

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-retrograde intubation combined with selectively tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (NR-ST-PCNL). Methods A retrospective analysis included 213 patients with upper urinary tract stones and hydronephrosis (renal pelvic separation > 10 mm) undergoing PCNL at our hospital from October 2023 to June 2025. Patients were divided into Group A (non-retrograde intubation, n = 109) and Group B (retrograde intubation, n = 104). Primary endpoint was postoperative complications and secondary endpoints included operative time, stone-free rate (SFR), visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, postoperative hospital stay, and hospitalization costs. Results Group A demonstrated significantly lower rates of postoperative complications [7.3% (8/109) vs. 18.2% (19/104), P = 0.017], shorter operative time [51.00 (37.00, 65.00) min vs. 71.50 (55.00, 90.75) min, P < 0.001], lower postoperative VAS scores [1.00 (0.00, 1.00) vs. 1.00 (0.00, 2.00), P = 0.008], shorter hospital stay [3.00 (2.00, 3.00) days vs. 4.00 (4.00, 4.00) days, P < 0.001], and lower hospitalization costs [17 028.00 (15 178.05, 17 934.50) RMB vs. 20 653.00 (19 176.25, 22 630.00) RMB, P < 0.001] compared with Group B. There was no significant difference in SFR between groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion For patients with upper urinary tract stones and renal pelvic separation > 10 mm, NR-ST-PCNL performed by experienced surgeons achieves comparable stone clearance to conventional techniques while reducing complication risk, shortening operative and hospitalization times, and lowering costs. It represents a safe, efficient, and optimized clinical approach.

Key words: non-retrograde, partiallytubeless, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, renal pelvic separation

中图分类号: