实用医学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 1352-1360.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.09.012

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    

舌系带成形术联合Twin-block矫治器治疗生长发育期下颌后缩患者的效果

陈宏吉1,宋娟1,邓末宏2()   

  1. 1.佛山市禅城区人民医院口腔科 (广东 佛山 528000 )
    2.武汉大学口腔医院光谷院区口腔颌面外科中心 ;(湖北 武汉 430000 )
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-31 出版日期:2025-05-10 发布日期:2025-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 邓末宏 E-mail:dengmohong@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科学技术厅农村科技重点项目(KTP20190276);佛山市自筹经费类科技计划(2320001006100-01)

Effects of lingual Tie⁃plasty combined with Twin⁃block orthodontic appliance for the treatment of patients with mandibular retraction during growth spurt

Hongji CHEN1,Juan SONG1,Mohong DENG2()   

  1. Department of Stomatology,Foshan Chancheng district People's Hospital,Foshan 528000,Guangdong,China
  • Received:2024-12-31 Online:2025-05-10 Published:2025-05-20
  • Contact: Mohong DENG E-mail:dengmohong@163.com

摘要:

目的 探讨舌系带成形术联合Twin-block矫治器对生长发育期下颌后缩患者的临床疗效。 方法 2023年8月至2024年8月就诊的42例骨性Ⅱ类错并伴有下颌后缩及舌系带过短患者,按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组各21例。对照组给予Twin-block矫治器治疗,观察组给予舌系带成形术联合Twin-block矫治器治疗。比较两组矫治时间及治疗前后进行简化Hazelbaker舌系带功能评估工具(HATLFF)评分以及舌系带长度测量。两组患者治疗前后均进行口腔锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),采用三维重建和头影测量分析舌与舌骨、上气道、上下颌骨和颞下颌关节的相关指标。 结果 对照组矫治时间[(10.14 ± 1.06)个月]显著长于观察组矫治时间[(8.00 ± 1.41)个月],差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗前,对照组和观察组简化HATLFF评分、舌系带长度以及舌与舌骨、上气道、上下颌骨和颞下颌关节的相关指标比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。治疗后,观察组简化HATLFF评分和舌系带长度显著高于治疗前(P < 0.05),对照组和观察组IP-CP、IP-RP、ANB、U1-SN、U1-NA角、U1-NA距、FCA和关节结节倾斜角均显著低于治疗前(P < 0.05),T-S、H-NP、H-CVP、H-Or、H-PP、H-MP、H-FH、H-PNS、上气道总体积、腭咽体积、舌咽体积、CL-CR、ML-MR、SNB、GoGn-SN、Go-Gn、Co-Gn、Co-Go、Ar-Go、L1-NB角、L1-NB距、L1-MP角、L1-MP距、SL、SE、Z、UI-PP、L6-MP、关节窝宽度、髁突顶部矢状面面积、髁状突高度、髁突顶部冠状面面积均显著高于治疗前(P < 0.05)。治疗后,观察组ANB差值显著低于对照组差值(P < 0.05),简化HATLFF评分、舌系带长度、T-S、H-Or、H-PP、H-FH、上气道总体积、腭咽体积、舌咽体积、CL-CR、ML-MR、Go-Gn、Ar-Go、L1-NB角、L1-NB距、SL、SE和L6-MP差值显著高于对照组差值(P < 0.05)。 结论 舌系带成形术联合Twin-block矫治器对生长发育期下颌后缩患者的矫治时间以及治疗效果优于单一Twin-block矫治器。

关键词: 下颌后缩, 骨性Ⅱ类错, 舌系带过短, Twin-block矫治器, 舌系带成形术, 生长发育期, 口腔锥形束计算机断层扫描, 颞下颌关节

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of lingual frenectomy combined with Twin-block orthodontic appliances in patients with mandibular retraction during the growth spurt. Methods Forty-two patients with osseous ClassⅡ malocclusion, characterized by mandibular retraction and short lingual frenulum, who were admitted to our hospital between August 2023 and August 2024, were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, each consisting of 21 patients. The control group was treated with Twin-block orthodontic appliances alone, while the observation group received treatment combining lingual frenuloplasty with Twin-block orthodontic appliances. Pre- and post-treatment comparisons were made between the two groups regarding treatment duration, Simplified Hazelbaker Assessment Tool for Lingual Frenulum Function (HATLFF) scores, and lingual frenulum length measurements. Oral cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed in both groups before and after treatment, and three-dimensional reconstruction and cephalometric analyses were utilized to evaluate indicators related to the tongue and hyoid bone, upper airway, maxilla and mandible, and temporomandibular joint. Results The corrective time in the control group (10.14 ± 1.06 months) was significantly longer than that in the observation group (8.00 ± 1.41 months) (P < 0.05). Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences between the control and observation groups in terms of simplified HATLFF scores, tongue tie lengths, or indicators related to the tongue and hyoid bone, upper airway, maxillomandibular complex, and temporomandibular joints (P > 0.05). After treatment, the simplified HATLFF scores and tongue tie lengths in the observation group were significantly higher than pre-treatment values (P < 0.05). Additionally, IP-CP, IP-RP, ANB, U1-SN, U1-NA angle, and U1-NA distance were significantly reduced in both the control and observation groups compared to pre-treatment levels (P < 0.05). Conversely, T-S, H-NP, H-CVP, H-Or, H-PP, H-MP, H-FH, H-PNS, total upper airway volume, palatopharyngeal volume, lingual pharyngeal volume, CL-CR, ML-MR, SNB, GoGn-SN, Go-Gn, Co-Gn, Co-Go, Ar-Go, L1-NB angle, L1-NB distance, L1-MP angle, L1-MP distance, SL, SE, Z, UI-PP, L6-MP, articular fossa width, condylar apical sagittal area, condylar height, and condylar apical coronal area were significantly increased post-treatment compared to pre-treatment levels (P < 0.05). Notably, after treatment, the ANB difference in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05), while the differences in simplified HATLFF scores, tongue tie length, T-S, H-Or, H-PP, H-FH, total upper airway volume, palatopharyngeal volume, lingual pharyngeal volume, CL-CR, ML-MR, Go-Gn, Ar-Go, L1-NB angle, L1-NB distance, SL, SE, and L6-MP were significantly greater in the observation group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Lingual tie-plasty combined with the Twin-block appliance demonstrates superior efficacy compared to the single Twin-block appliance in terms of treatment duration and clinical outcomes for patients exhibiting mandibular retraction during the growth spurt..

Key words: mandibular retraction, bony class Ⅱ malocclusion, ankyloglossia, Twin-block orthodontic appliance, lingual tie-plasty, growth spurt, oral cone-beam computed tomography, temporomandibular joints

中图分类号: