实用医学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 1409-1415.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2023.11.015

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同麻醉方式对全髋关节置换术老年患者围术期炎症应激及免疫功能的影响 

吴文棋1,2 邓恋3 马武华4 蔡诚毅4    

  1. 1 广州中医药大学(广州 510405);2 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院(广州 510120);3 广东省妇幼保健院麻醉科 (广州 510010);4 广州中医药大学第一附属医院麻醉科(广州 510405) 
  • 出版日期:2023-06-10 发布日期:2023-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 蔡诚毅 E⁃mail:xiaocaimazui@yahoo.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:82074357);贝朗麻醉科学研究基金(编号:BBDF⁃2019⁃009) 

Effects of different anesthesia techniques on perioperative inflammatory stress and immune function in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty 

WU Wenqi*,DENG Lian,MA Wuhua,CAI Chengyi. #br#   

  1. Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510405,China
  • Online:2023-06-10 Published:2023-06-10
  • Contact: CAI Chengyi E⁃mail:xiaocaimazui@yahoo.com.cn
  • Supported by:

摘要:

目的 比较神经阻滞复合喉罩全麻、腰硬联合麻醉与全身麻醉对行全髋关节置换术老年患者 围术期炎症应激及免疫功能的影响。方法 选择择期行单侧全髋关节置换术患者60例,男21例,女39例, 年龄 63 ~ 80 岁,体质量指数 17 ~ 35 kg/m2 ,ASAⅡ级或以上,随机分为 3 组:神经阻滞复合喉罩全麻组 (N 组)、腰硬联合麻醉组(E组)和全身麻醉组(G组),每组20例。N组给予腰骶丛神经阻滞复合喉罩全麻, E 组给予腰硬联合麻醉,G 组给予全身麻醉。术后各组采用自控镇痛(PCIA)。于术前 24 h、术后 1 h、术后 24 h采集各组患者血液,采用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测血浆IL⁃10、皮质醇、CRP、IL⁃4、IFN⁃γ水平。记录 术前 24 h、术后 12 h 及术后 24 h VAS 疼痛评分。结果 与 G 组比,N 组术中瑞芬太尼用量减少(P < 0.05)。 各组间麻黄碱及阿托品使用差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。与G组相比,N组及E组术后24 h血浆IL⁃4水平 降低(P < 0.05),IFN⁃γ/IL⁃4 比值升高(P < 0.05);术后 1 h 血浆皮质醇水平降低(P < 0.05),术后 24 h 血浆 IL⁃10、皮质醇、CRP 水平降低(P < 0.05)。与 G 组相比,N 组术后 12 h VAS 评分减少并具有临床意义(P < 0.05)。结论 神经阻滞复合喉罩全麻以及腰硬联合麻醉相比于全身麻醉可以减少老年患者全髋关节置换 术后免疫和炎症应激反应相关细胞因子的表达,其中神经阻滞复合喉罩全麻具有更优的镇痛效果。 

关键词: 腰骶丛神经阻滞, 腰硬联合麻醉, 免疫功能, 应激反应, 全髋关节置换术

Abstract:

Objective To compare the effects of nerve block combined with laryngeal mask anesthesia, combined spinal⁃epidural anesthesia,and general anesthesia on perioperative inflammatory stress and immune func⁃ tion in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Methods Totally 60 patients who underwent unilateral total hip arthroplasty,including 21 males and 39 females,aged 63 ~ 80 years,with a BMI of 17 ~ 35 kg/m2 ,ASA Ⅱ or above,were randomly divided into nerve block combined with laryngeal mask anesthesia group(group N),combined spinal⁃epidural anesthesia group(group E),and general anesthesia group(group G),with 20 cases in each group. Group N was given lumbosacral plexus nerve block combined with laryngeal mask general anesthesia; group E combined spinal ⁃epidural anesthesia,and group G general anesthesia. After the operation,each group adopted patient ⁃controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA). Blood samples of patients in each group were collected before surgery,1 hour and 24 hours after surgery. Enzyme ⁃linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)was used to detect plasma IL⁃10,cortisol,CRP,IL⁃4,and IFN⁃γ level. VAS pain score was recorded 24 h before surgery,12 h and 24 h after surgery. Results Compared with that in group G,the dose of remifentanil in group N was reduced (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in ephedrine and atropine use among the three groups(P > 0.05). Compared with those in group G,the plasma IL⁃4 level of groups N and E were reduced after 24 hours of surgery (P < 0.05),and the IFN⁃γ/IL⁃4 ratio increased(P < 0.05);plasma cortisol level decreased 1 hour after surgery (P < 0.05),and plasma IL⁃10,cortisol,and CRP level decreased 24 hours after surgery(P < 0.05). Compared with that of group G,the VAS score of group N decreased 12 hours after surgery,showing clinical significance (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with general anesthesia,nerve block combined with laryngeal mask anesthesia and spinal⁃epidural anesthesia can reduce the expression of immune and inflammatory stress⁃related cytokines after total hip replacement surgery in elderly patients,among which nerve block combined with laryngeal mask anes⁃ thesia has better analgesic effect. 

Key words: lumbosacral plexus nerve block, combined spinal?epidural anesthesia, immune function, inflammatory stress, total hip arthroplasty.