实用医学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 1160-1166.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.08.024

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    

Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后患者疾病感知及应对方式对社会参与的影响

刘冰1,陈瀚熙2,刘汶佶1,黄颖雯1,王燕1,黄婵1,由天辉1()   

  1. 1.广东药科大学护理学院 (广州 510310 )
    2.南方医科大学附属广东省人民医院(广东省医学科学院)护理部 ;(广州 510080 )
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-25 出版日期:2024-04-25 发布日期:2024-04-19
  • 通讯作者: 由天辉 E-mail:youth888cn@aliyun.com
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科研基金面上项目(A2023030);广东省“登峰计划”科研专项课题立项资助面上项目(DFJH2023011)

Impacts of illness perception and coping style on social participation in patients receiving surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection

Bing LIU1,Hanxi CHEN2,Wenji LIU1,Yingwen HUANG1,Yan WANG1,Chan HUANG1,Tianhui. YOU1()   

  1. *.School of Nursing,Guangdong Pharmaceutical University,Guangzhou 510310,China
  • Received:2023-07-25 Online:2024-04-25 Published:2024-04-19
  • Contact: Tianhui. YOU E-mail:youth888cn@aliyun.com

摘要:

目的 探讨Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后患者疾病感知、应对方式对社会参与的影响及作用机制。 方法 以便利抽样法选取214例Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后患者,采用简易疾病感知问卷(BIPQ)、医学应对量表(MCMQ)、自主参与问卷(IPA)进行调查。采用Bootstrap法分析疾病感知、应对方式与社会参与之间的关系。 结果 Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后患者社会参与得分(51.74 ± 16.50)分,疾病感知总分为(49.74 ± 12.61)分,面对应对得分(22.87 ± 5.18)分,回避应对得分(14.96 ± 3.05)分,屈服应对得分(10.80 ± 3.93)分;疾病感知与社会参与呈正相关(P < 0.01),应对方式中面对与疾病感知和社会参与呈负相关(P < 0.01),屈服与疾病感知和社会参与呈正相关(P < 0.01)。面对和屈服在疾病感知和社会参与间起平行中介作用(P < 0.01),分别占总效应的29. 65%、16. 05%。 结论 Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后患者的社会参与处于中等偏下水平,应对方式是疾病感知与社会参与的中介变量。医护人员可以通过提高患者的正性疾病感知,引导患者积极应对疾病,提高社会参与水平。

关键词: Stanford A型主动脉夹层, 社会参与, 疾病感知, 应对方式, 中介效应

Abstract:

Objective To explore the impacts of illness perception and coping style on social participation in patients receiving surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection, so as to provide reference for making intervention measures. Methods A total of 214 patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection who had received surgical treatment were selected by convenience sampling. Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire(BIPQ),Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire(MCMQ), and Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire(IPA) were used for survey. Bootstrapping was used to analyze the association of social participation with illness perception and coping style. Results For the patients, IPA score was (51.74 ± 16.50) points, BIPQ score was (49.74 ± 12.61), and the subscales scores of correspondence to confrontation, avoidance, and acceptance-resignation were (22.87 ± 5.18), (14.96 ± 3.05) and (10.80 ± 3.93), respectively. Illness perception was positively correlated with social participation(P < 0.01), confrontation was negatively correlated with illness perception and social participation(P < 0.01), surrender was positively correlated with illness perception and social participation(P < 0.01). confrontation and acceptance-resignation play a parallel mediating role between illness perception and social participation(P < 0.01), accounting for 29.65% and 16.05% of the total effect, respectively. Conclusions Social participation is at a medium and below level in the patients receiving surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection, coping style is intermediary variable for illness perception and social participation. By increasing the positive illness perception in the patients, medical staff can instruct them to cope actively with their disease and to enhance their social participation.

Key words: stanford type A aortic dissection, social participation, illness perception, coping style, intermediary effect

中图分类号: